Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 May 5



File:3 NeSSI Systems.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:07, 13 May 2013 (UTC)


 * File:3 NeSSI Systems.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * see commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:3 NeSSI Systems.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 16:34, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Natan.Karczmar.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:07, 13 May 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Natan.Karczmar.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Derivative Work of ... TVs? Painting? Photo?.  Ron h jones  (Talk) 17:53, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Mark 1 Birdy folding bike.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:09, 13 May 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Mark 1 Birdy folding bike.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Derivative Work - cut out image  Ron h jones  (Talk) 17:57, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:IMindMap 3D view screenshot.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:07, 13 May 2013 (UTC)


 * File:IMindMap 3D view screenshot.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Screenshot - Flickr license is not valid  Ron h jones  (Talk) 18:02, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:LuziaWoman.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:09, 13 May 2013 (UTC)


 * File:LuziaWoman.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The skull was found in 1975, so the reconstruction figure must be post 1975 and subject to copyright.  Ron h jones  (Talk) 18:33, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment the visual appearance of the person, as the reconstruction represents it, would be important to the understanding of the subject, so it would seem a fairuse image should be created for this topic. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 08:40, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The visual appearance is just an artist's guess, isn't it? We wouldn't accept a non-free depiction of Jesus Christ (since they are all guesswork), and the article about him currently only contains photos of PD depictions. I would say that this violates WP:NFCC. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:52, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure it matters if it's a guess or not - at the end of the day it's still a sculpture, a person has taken many, many hours in creating it - it surely does not matter what they used to create it - be it a photo, an actual sitting or a skull.  Ron h jones  (Talk) 18:45, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * That's true. However, if it is just a guess and not verifiable information, then the work seems to violate WP:NFCC, meaning that fair use isn't an option for us. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:18, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Isn't there a copyright issue with the photograph itself? There's no claim of self-work and I have think, in the balance, that this must be a commercial image. Mangoe (talk) 16:17, 8 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Ah, yes, that too. When you find a problem with an image, it is easy to miss other problems with the image. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:17, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Theodora Pejacsevich.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete as we have a perfectly good image for this use which is unquestionably free. This one could likely be shown to be free as well with some legwork, if someone's up for it. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:25, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Theodora Pejacsevich.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Artist in Belgium at the time of creation, died in 1963 - copyright until 2033  Ron h jones  (Talk) 19:25, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Convert to fairuse and use on both artist and subject articles. The artist article is missing a sample of hist portraiture work, which is necessary to the understanding of his style. If there are no free images of the subject of the portrait, then we'd use a fairuse image of the composer. -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 06:47, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete - there is an out-of-copyright photo of Dora Pejačević at File:Dora Pejacevic.jpg which I've added to the article, replacing this non-free image. Vanka, the artist, was known for his murals, so this painting would not be representative of his oeuvre. Sionk (talk) 10:19, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * It was made before 1923, so there is a fair chance that this satisfies PD-US-1923-abroad. Unlike what wrote, the copyright only expires after 2033 if the painting was never published (or exhibited) before 2003, which is unlikely. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:54, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Seruwagi ronald.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep. The copyright in the EXIF data would likely indicate a separate rightsholder if one existed (compare the EXIF data from professional images such as those from Getty or AFP). This image is distinct from the one which was earlier deleted as F11, and there's a lot of circumstantial evidence that this is actually just a personal photograph. (ESkog)(Talk) 16:28, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Seruwagi ronald.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Copyright notice in EXIF data. Eeekster (talk) 21:05, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment would that be autogenerated by the camera? -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 06:43, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * I've seen things like that at many places. I would believe that it is something generated by certain camera models. According to the EXIF, the photo was taken in 2006. The copyright is held by someone even if the image is freely licensed, so the EXIF tells nothing about the licensing status I'd say. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:58, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The uploader previously uploaded an image with the same name which was deleted as F11. Was that the same image? It says in the notice on the uploader's talk page that the image was taken from Facebook. No hits on Google Images, but Facebook images often don't seem to show up there. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:58, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:This is the official seal of Father Saturnino Urios University. A Roman Catholic university in Butuan City run by the Diocese of Butuan.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, with the addition of a fair use rationale. Dianna (talk) 12:17, 16 May 2013 (UTC)
 * File:This is the official seal of Father Saturnino Urios University. A Roman Catholic university in Butuan City run by the Diocese of Butuan.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Seal of a university. Uploader seems to be claiming they are the copyright holder of the image because they enhanced it. ALH (talk) 22:41, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Convert to fairuse image used for self-identificaiton by the university -- 65.94.76.126 (talk) 06:42, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * ✅ - Converted to fair use and rescaled to comply with WP:NFCC.--GrapedApe (talk) 10:56, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:08, 6 May 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.