Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 October 18



File:GregoryStEntrance.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:11, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
 * File:GregoryStEntrance.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Unclear copyright tag. Originally marked as PD-self, but an IP changed it to suggest that the image comes from http://stpatspics.blogspot.com/ where I can't find it. The image appears to have been at http://www2.rok.catholic.edu.au/page.asp?id=122 since 2004. Stefan2 (talk) 14:07, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Other files with source & copyright tag changed by an IP for which I can't find any pre-Wikipedia use:
 * File:Spcchurchservice.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:Modhistyr12.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:Isbyr11.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:Riceathleticswarcry.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:SPCtechbuilding.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:Stpatsoldprimaryschool.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

Stefan2 (talk) 14:13, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:House of gurney.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  23:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)


 * File:House of gurney.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No evidence of permission. Looks old, so maybe PD for some reason, but needs more information in order to verify that. Stefan2 (talk) 14:22, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Supreme Court Complex of Sri Lanka.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  23:01, 28 October 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Supreme Court Complex of Sri Lanka.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

Please avoid deletion by adding this as a source if it is possible-http://www.dailynews.lk/local/settled-land-powers-state. This photo was in my system among the other photos of sri lanka given to me by my friend, and apologise for the mistake.Rameshnta909 (talk) 10:51, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Dubious own work claim: previously published in lower resolution at various places, e.g. http://www.dailynews.lk/local/settled-land-powers-state http://www.globalpeacesupport.com/2013/09/petitions-to-be-filed-against-tna-manifesto-today/ Stefan2 (talk) 20:59, 18 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Explanation
 * Why did you remove the above comment? There is no evidence that the mentioned website has agreed to publish the image under the specified licence. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:01, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The editor who uploaded the file has today updated the data for the file, and confirmed the source as being http://www.dailynews.lk/local/settled-land-powers-state, so the previous claim to be the copyright holder is obviously invalid. - David Biddulph (talk) 17:34, 21 October 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.