Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 September 15



File:Clive Brook.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Clive Brook.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:CliveBrook.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 00:04, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Documentary Filmmaker Navalpreet Rangi.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Documentary Filmmaker Navalpreet Rangi.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Navalpreet Rangi.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 00:09, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:No Secrets KCA 2002.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * File:No Secrets KCA 2002.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * no proof that this is the uploaders "own work" Redsky89 (talk) 06:19, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:JessiMalayRolePlayConcert.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * File:JessiMalayRolePlayConcert.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * no proof that this is the uploaders "own work" Redsky89 (talk) 06:19, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Jessi Malay Album Cover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Kept as fair use for the article about the album. Diannaa (talk) 23:29, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Jessi Malay Album Cover.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * this is an album cover not free definitely not "own work" Redsky89 (talk) 06:21, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Texas Master Peace Officer badge.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn. Diannaa (talk) 23:34, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Texas Master Peace Officer badge.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Badge design, not necessarily uploader's own work. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:43, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I would suggest that you 1) AGF and 2) apologize. I created the design on my Mac.  GregJackP   Boomer!   13:56, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I am sorry, but the concern here was that the underlying design was not 'freely' licensed. If Texas does license freely, then there is no issue.Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:12, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 * What underlying design being "freely" licensed? There is no copyright holder for a circle/texas badge, and multiple badge companies offer their own designs.  State agency badge designs are completely different and vary significantly from what I created.  Those examples are Texas DPS (state police), Texas Rangers, Game Warden, Texas Alc. Bev. Comm'n, and TCLEOSE.  As a matter of fact, the closest thing to a copyright is offered by a commercial company here, which is obviously completely different from the very simple design that I did on my Mac.  GregJackP   Boomer!   01:42, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * This badge is entirely of your own design, not an official badge of this organisation. Right? -- Diannaa (talk) 02:27, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Correct.  GregJackP   Boomer!   02:33, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * I think we should keep it then; all the correct licensing seems to be in place. -- Diannaa (talk) 03:11, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Withdrawn (with apologies) status confirmed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:47, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Bhagat Singh 1922.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete
 * File:Bhagat Singh 1922.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This photo may not be in the public domain outside India, because it was taken when he was prison in 1927, not 1922 as shown on the file name. Diannaa (talk) 16:17, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment This should probably get the same closure as Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bhagat Singh 1922 prison photo.jpg, so we should probably wait until that discussion has been closed. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:44, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete This photo was deleted from Commons. From the discussion at Commons, it was not published before 1947, which in turn means that while it may be PD in India, it is not PD in the US due to the URAA. For it to be PD in the US the image should have been in the public domain in India by 1996, ie. published in India before 1941, which is apparently not the case. —RP88 (talk) 17:58, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Pragathicoimbatore.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Pragathicoimbatore.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The metadata does not confirm ownership. It looks like a newspaper scan. — Ganeshk  ( talk ) 17:10, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: uploader has extensive history of uploading images found from other sources and claiming them as free and/or his own. DMacks (talk) 19:31, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:AvtoportretG.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * File:AvtoportretG.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * It says that this is in the public domain in the United States as it is a photo of a painting published before 1923. However, the artist was born after 1923, so the painting can impossibly have been published before 1923. Stefan2 (talk) 17:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Dvanadciat'.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Dvanadciat& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * It says that this is in the public domain in the United States as it is a photo of a painting published before 1923. However, the artist was born after 1923, so the painting can impossibly have been published before 1923. Stefan2 (talk) 17:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Sviato kartopli.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Sviato kartopli.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * It says that this is in the public domain in the United States as it is a photo of a painting published before 1923. However, the artist was born after 1923, so the painting can impossibly have been published before 1923. Stefan2 (talk) 17:23, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Ecuador'a 20S Banknote, Anverse, Reverse 1240px.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Ecuador& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * There is no evidence presented that this is exempt from copyright in the source country. Stefan2 (talk) 17:51, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Eleanor of Guelders.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Eleanor of Guelders.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Eleanor of Woodstock.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 17:56, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Usarray_installation_plan.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Usarray installation plan.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader claims as own work a file that I have seen elsewhere. (Looking for sources.) ~ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk)
 * An essentially identical image, lacking only the Earth Scope logo, is found at http://www.usarray.org/maps, which appears to be copyrighted. Also at http://web.mst.edu/~sgao/USArray/usarray-map-us.jpg, and in one or more publications. If uploader does not speedily provide some explanation I will ask for speedy deletion. ~ J. Johnson (JJ) (talk) 23:14, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Fauth.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Kept as fair use for one article. Diannaa (talk) 23:49, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Fauth.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Philipp Johann Heinrich Fauth.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 22:34, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Washington-bible.jpg
<div class="boilerplate vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep. The Bible is not available for photography, and there's no consensus to delete the image. The image has now been tagged as Fair Use. Diannaa (talk) 15:48, 15 November 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Washington-bible.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This photograph is of a book as a three dimensional object, so the rationale behind it being PD for being 2D and already public domain is flawed. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:37, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * So why not just change it to the rationale for a 3-D object? Jack1956 (talk) 07:23, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Because photos of 3D object require permission from the photographer. There is no evidence that the photographer has granted any permission here. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:09, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * So why don't photos of 2D works of art need permission from the photographer? Isn't use of it with a 3D tag covered by this?: "Per § 107 it is believed that reproduction for criticism, comment, teaching and scholarship constitutes fair use and does not infringe copyright. It is believed that the use of a picture to illustrate the three-dimensional work of art in question, on the English-language Wikipedia, hosted on servers in the United States by the non-profit Wikimedia Foundation, qualifies as fair use under United States copyright law." Jack1956 (talk) 14:44, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Replaceable fair use is what you're pushing for. This book appears to be open for public viewing, so a new picture could still be taken. 2D does not require permission as the US does not recognise sweat of brow as a rationale for copyright: the act of faithfully scanning a 2D object does not reach the threshold of creativity required for the US copyright law. 3D objects, on the other hand, take on additional considerations of angles, lighting, etc. which all help it pass the necessary creativity to draw a new copyright. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 14:59, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The Bible is not open for public viewing. As the Bible of a Masonic Lodge, and one of America's most important and precious documents, it is kept securely locked away. Because of its fragility it is not opened anymore including at any state occasions or lodge ceremony at which it may be used. The image therefore is irreplacable, especially as it shows the Bible open. Jack1956 (talk) 17:38, 16 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 11:36, 17 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:EysenckPersonalityTypes.gif
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * File:EysenckPersonalityTypes.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hans Eysenck's 4 Personality Types.gif; no evidence of PD-author claim. Stefan2 (talk) 22:46, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:FOSI logo, Indonesian Sedimentologists Forum.jpg
<div class="boilerplate metadata vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:30, 8 October 2013 (UTC)


 * File:FOSI logo, Indonesian Sedimentologists Forum.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * See Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/File:FOSI Logo, Indonesian Sedimentologists Forum.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 23:00, 15 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.