Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2013 September 8



File:Zain Saidin-9.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted as F1 by AnomieBOT ⚡  11:58, 9 September 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Zain Saidin-9.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Where is this file located in the net? If found it might be unfree because the work seems to be of a professional.  Sohambanerjee1998  07:11, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete F1 -- 70.24.244.158 (talk) 08:02, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tyrone hayes.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Tyrone hayes.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Unclear whether this is the uploader's work, source given as "student took photograph". Image has been widely published prior to upload here, eg . January  ( talk ) 08:09, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Rupintojas.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete - no FOP for commercial use in Lithuania. Deleted by
 * File:Rupintojas.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The photo was taken in Lithuania, a country that does not have freedom of panorama for sculptures. Diannaa (talk) 15:04, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Petar VI of Croatia.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the debate was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)


 * File:Petar VI of Croatia.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Obviously not PD-ineligible as tagged. Not enough information provided (exact author, date etc) to determine the actual copyright status. January  ( talk ) 18:37, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, known hoaxter's sockpuppet... --Joy &#91;shallot&#93; (talk) 11:21, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:F.K.KUKËSI.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Kept as fair use for one article. Diannaa (talk) 23:58, 18 September 2013 (UTC)
 * File:F.K.KUKËSI.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Logo artwork. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:22, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Tollvesenet seal.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: There's no opportunity here for fair use, as the file is not being used. Deleted. Diannaa (talk) 00:01, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Tollvesenet seal.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader claims exempetion, Is this correct for Norway? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:28, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The uploader seems to be trying to point us to this image's copyright ineligibility tag, which states:

"This official Norwegian coat of arms is ineligible for copyright, but its usage is restricted according to Norwegian penal law, independent of the copyright status of the depiction shown here. Other countries may or may not have similar restrictions."
 * I don't think this answers your question, Sfan (as this in turn is just another assertion of copyright ineligibility), but it may point us toward the uploader's rationale at least. Wilhelm Meis (&#9742; Diskuss &#124; &#x270D; Beiträge) 13:07, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Tollvesenet itself doesn't seem to consider their logo in the public domain. One has to request permission to use it, and the logo must not be modified. Fair use might apply, though. They do however open up for the possibility to just use the text without the heraldic part, which I'm not sure if falls under copyright restrictions or not. Ters (talk) 15:55, 9 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Falkirk Rugby Football Club.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Kept as fair use for one article. Diannaa (talk) 00:07, 19 September 2013 (UTC)
 * File:Falkirk Rugby Football Club.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Logo artwork. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:03, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.