Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 April 25



File:Eddie Lucio, III.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Eddie Lucio, III.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image is online in the same resolution eg: http://bloximages.newyork1.vip.townnews.com/valleymorningstar.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/9/d3/9d380ff4-24fa-11e2-97c9-001a4bcf6878/5093da74d8888.image.jpg. Previously uploaded by the same person with a note that it came from Facebook Peripitus (Talk) 00:24, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:London Scottish golf club.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * File:London Scottish golf club.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Photo of a painting. Photo is attributed to Wensley Thorpe but there is also an exact copy at http://www.londonscottishgolfclub.co.uk/6. Copyright date on the website predates the upload date here. Regardless the copyright remains with the painter, unless this is a work-for-hire by the Club, in which case they own the copyright. Peripitus (Talk) 00:34, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:CharlesLloyd shadowsax.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * File:CharlesLloyd shadowsax.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * claimed as self-made in 2014. The subject is 76 and all images I can see online of him recently have him with a goatee, much less hair, and looking significantly older. I suspect this is someone else's image from a while ago. See him now in http://media.npr.org/assets/img/2013/03/15/cl_slide-92c3939bb6b234d4557aa5e8e324dd061e9261b6-s6-c30.jpg Peripitus (Talk) 00:49, 25 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Hi Peripitus, this photo was taken by the subject's spouse, and she just let me know now that it was taken in 1991, not 2014. That accounts for the difference in the subject's appearance. His wife requested that the photo be put up on the Charles Lloyd wiki page, and accordingly released it. Does that help? Ropeadoper (talk) 19:07, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * that makes it clearer. What you need then is to follow the process at Donating copyrighted materials to verify and permanently record this copyright release - Peripitus (Talk) 22:51, 25 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Thanks very much. I've gone in and updated the year of the photo to 1991, as well as the license, to GNU Free Documentation. Ropeadoper (talk) 16:37, 28 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sawmill sawdust pile pembroke.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Sawmill sawdust pile pembroke.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No indication that the image is GFDL/CC at source listed. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:39, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vancouver House by day.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Vancouver House by day.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image is widely available on the internet - I don't think this rendering was created by the uploader Peripitus (Talk) 23:16, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.