Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 April 26



File:Madeline Sands.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 03:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Madeline Sands.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image is visible online at http://static.squarespace.com/static/531919afe4b078aab7f8b3ca/t/53229af2e4b0291fee78942f/1394776819287/. at the very least this needs an WP:OTRS email to confirm the licence. Peripitus (Talk) 05:28, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Dr. Jafar Bolhari.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:05, 30 April 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Dr. Jafar Bolhari.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * differently cropped versions of the same image can be seen online eg: at http://www.farsnews.com/newstext.php?nn=13920920000695 . I think that this image is just taken from a website. Peripitus (Talk) 05:33, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete It's a re-upload of a deleted image - 03:22, 24 April 2014 Diannaa deleted page File:Dr. Jafar Bolhari.jpg (File deleted: F11: No evidence of permission for more than 7 days (TW)). Original source was specified as http://publicrelations.tums.ac.ir/news/detail.asp?newsID=32800  Ron h jones  (Talk) 23:39, 29 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Memphis Tennessee.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Memphis Tennessee.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No source given for the 5 images in this collage. The bottom one comes from http://www.ktransit.com/transit/NAmerica/ussouth/Memphis/Photos/mem-vt-P1979-W454-ms-cov-090407-03.jpg and I suspect that this is not a collage of self-made images. Peripitus (Talk) 05:37, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Razorcake Issue 1 cover.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Razorcake Issue 1 cover.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * One of several images uploaded by this editor for use in a gallery-like section of Razorcake. davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  20:47, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I have marked this editor's two uploads on the Wikimedia commons with.
 * It is possible that this person is in fact the copyright owner or represents the copyright owner. In this case, an OTRS permission is all we need.  However, if that is the case, then the the article he basically wrote himself a few years ago and still maintains, Razorcake, will need a connected contributor template and he will need to abide by WP:Conflict of interest when editing that page in the future.  davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  21:00, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Razorcake Issue 10.tif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Razorcake Issue 10.tif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * See . This request covers both uploads under this file name. davidwr/  (talk)/(contribs)  20:54, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Razorcake Issue 30.tif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Razorcake Issue 30.tif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * see . davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  20:54, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Razorcake Issue 50.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Razorcake Issue 50.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * see . davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  20:54, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Razorcake Issue 75.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 4 May 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Razorcake Issue 75.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * see . davidwr/ (talk)/(contribs)  20:54, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.