Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 April 3



File:Redhorse.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:10, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Redhorse.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Based on my research, it's highly unlikely that this contemporary sculpture is under a CC A license - we will need permission from the copyright holder, who is most likely the artist, to determine that. SarahStierch (talk) 04:54, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep Photos of sculptures are not copyrighted themselves, see File:Copenhagen - the little mermaid statue - 2013.jpg or File:Bear and Policeman de Jeff Koons (Versailles) (2973144437).jpg for example. walk victor falktalk 07:23, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Neo Blythe Mrs Retro Mama and Miss Sally Rice.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:10, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Neo Blythe Mrs Retro Mama and Miss Sally Rice.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Derivative work of toy design. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 08:04, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Portrait of Min Q Pai, 1972.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:10, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Portrait of Min Q Pai, 1972.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

This statement is not compatible with any of the free licenses as it does not state that the image can be modified, only that it can be copied. Peripitus (Talk) 12:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
 * The website states "All photographs on this website Copyright © 1964-2009 by Ramon Korff The photographs on this website may be freely copied and distributed if "Copyright © 1964-2009 (or appropriate range of dates) by Ramon Korff" is included."


 * Delete No permission for modification given. walk victor falktalk 07:14, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ryan Beatty Main.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:10, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Ryan Beatty Main.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Marked as public domain but I cannot see where, on the linked website, this image is released this way. There are numerous (c) marks on the site but no information I can see on a free licence or public domain release Peripitus (Talk) 20:46, 3 April 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Not apparent on original site that material is released to the public domain; assume to be copyrighted. walk <i style="color:green;">victor falk</i><i style="color:green;">talk</i> 07:13, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.