Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 August 20



File:Tamalpaisindians.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Tamalpaisindians.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This appears in Category:Possibly unfree files from 2014 July 11, but there doesn't seem to be any PUF discussion for it. This is a logo and is unlikely the work of the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 11:14, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Seth Rollins in August 2014.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:03, 28 August 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Seth Rollins in August 2014.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Appears to be a screenshot, png format is unusual for photos and the metadata is typical of screenshots. January  ( talk ) 15:32, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Colin and Julie's route through the Mediterranean.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep: OTRS permission received and covers the appropriate base map information. Everything is accounted for. Cheers,  TLSuda  (talk) 20:05, 27 August 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Colin and Julie& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This was deleted because User:Ronhjones tagged the file with, and now the map (or a different map) has been reposted with OTRS pending. I don't think that the system is meant to allow people to repost the image every month after it has been deleted, so the file should probably be deleted and only be undeleted if permission eventually shows up. Stefan2 (talk) 18:35, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete If this was commons then the second upload would have been blocked automatically as a duplicate, I don't see why it should be different here. The only good thing is that the bug at OTRS is fixed, so we can search for urls again, thus if it stays they need to get it sorted in 30 days now. Ron h jones (Talk) 19:07, 20 August 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Colin Angus sent permissions an email saying that the base map came from Wikipedia Commons. What more do we (Colin and myself) need to do? Thanks, Steve
 * As I said on my talk page - the resolution of the declared base map (commons:File:Blank_Map_-_Mediterranean_1.svg) is not as good as the route map (the multitude of minor islands is far greater - I've overlaid the two in PhotoShop), thus I think the wrong url for the base map has been given. The OTRS ticket is still in progress (Created: 14/08/2014 15:53). Ron h jones (Talk) 22:29, 26 August 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.