Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 December 11



File:Cadre.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Cadre.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The file is signed by Jean-Claude Burel. There is no evidence that this is the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 00:28, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Caiman.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 17:12, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Caiman.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Overwritten file: two in one. User:Ericbarr never modified the file information page, so we do not know under which licence his file is available. The file by User:Tmurgy has both source and licence. Stefan2 (talk) 00:34, 11 December 2014 (UTC)


 * The second image is a likely copyvio, it was posted at a month before it was uploaded here. We should delete that version and revert to the first uploader's file, the description page should be reverted to [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Caiman.jpg&diff=115414261&oldid=111308675 this revision].  January  ( talk ) 12:54, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Campus1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Campus1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Overwritten file: three in one. The files from 2008 have unknown source and licence. Stefan2 (talk) 00:46, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ceredyne bull.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete per research by OTRS cited below. (ESkog)(Talk) 20:02, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Ceredyne bull.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploaded in 2008 with the comment "I forwarded a copy of the email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org detailing the President of Ceredyne giving me permission to upload and use this photo" but no OTRS ticket can be found for this (see WP:OTRSN). It is tagged PD-USGov but the uploader's comment indicates that it was not a US Govt work. January  ( talk ) 15:51, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carina.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Carina.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * "Source: NOAO" and "Author: Curtis Schmidt telescope at the Cerro Tololo Interamerican Observatory" suggest that this isn't own work by the uploader. Stefan2 (talk) 16:50, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carpet.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Carpet.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Overwritten file: three in one. At least some of the files are unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 17:01, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Castelul Huniazilor.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted older image as F4 (no source); deleted newer image as F8. Diannaa (talk) 22:36, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Castelul Huniazilor.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Overwritten file: two in one.

Revision 1: Uploaded in 2005. No source or licence provided before uploading revision 2.

Revision 2: Uploaded in 2006. A few minutes later, the uploader added tags saying that the file is own work.

The second revision seems to have come as a response to the file being tagged as unsourced by User:OrphanBot. This could mean that the uploader didn't know the source and therefore had to replace the image with a sourced image. Do we treat the first revision as unsourced and unlicensed?

The second revision has been copied to Commons. Stefan2 (talk) 17:30, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Caudron G-4.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 18:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Caudron G-4.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Unverifiable source. Stefan2 (talk) 17:35, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:200 років Шевченко реверс.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:12, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * File:200 років Шевченко реверс.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * See c:COM:ART. Stefan2 (talk) 18:35, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Under a Cruel Star (book cover).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Under a Cruel Star (book cover).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Dubious own work: book cover. Stefan2 (talk) 22:04, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ola Schubert (2006).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:12, 22 January 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Ola Schubert (2006).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The permission only seems to be for Wikipedia. In either case, there is no OTRS ticket. Stefan2 (talk) 23:06, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Charlie Huang playing a Guqin.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:12, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Charlie Huang playing a Guqin.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Overwritten file: four in one. According to the text on the file information page, three different photographers have been involved, but no OTRS ticket is present. Stefan2 (talk) 23:14, 11 December 2014 (UTC)
 * All the files have been uploaded by me or were taken by me or someone else I know who releases it to me to use as I please. The three older versions may be deleted or if not, you may delete the entire file.--Charlie Huang 【遯卋山人】 11:16, 12 December 2014 (UTC).
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.