Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 January 18



File:Betamax c7.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:03, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Betamax c7.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader has uploaded this same image before and it has been deleted per COPYVIO. Uploader has run into several COPYVIO issues recently with similar images. Uploader claims "self-made file", but same image appears on this page, this page, and many others, including several with the exact same pixel dimensions as the one the uploader provided; uploader clearly did not originate this. Jeh (talk) 04:04, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * its a old photo and people like there photos on wikipedia it gives them a feeling of importance in life even though i said i technically took the photo my self i meant " i took it from a upload without anybodys help" maybe a exaggeration but not a true lie i think the person who owns the photo most probably left the photo to expire on a expired ebay listing where it deletes over time. and has gone DVD by now check out my legal action on his click http://www.flickr.com/photos/highamspark/9395730925/John Johnstone Smith (talk) 11:59, 18 January 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete Uploader has been informed about copyright on several occasions, and ignores the warnings both here and at Commons. In this thread, he gives me the distinct impression that he believes that copyright expires simultaneously with the eBay listing that the photo was used on, a view which seems to be restated above. -- Red rose64 (talk) 12:27, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:CC4392 RCA full size VHS.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:03, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * File:CC4392 RCA full size VHS.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Probably fraudulent claim of own work. Uploader has run into several COPYVIO issues recently with similar images. Uploader claims "self-made file", but same image appears on several pages on the web; see this Google image search. Image is obviously taken from a product catalog. Jeh (talk) 04:55, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Uploader has a history of uploading non-free images created by others under a fraudulent claim of "own work", both here and at Commons. -- Red rose64 (talk) 12:27, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kodak model B bedside Sony Betamax portable video camera unit SLO 340.tif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:04, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Kodak model B bedside Sony Betamax portable video camera unit SLO 340.tif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Probably fraudulent claim of own work. Uploader has run into several COPYVIO issues recently with similar images. Uploader claims "self-made file", but the "Kodak model B" part was clearly taken from the web, per this Google search. Jeh (talk) 05:21, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Uploader has a history of uploading non-free images created by others under a fraudulent claim of "own work", both here and at Commons. -- Red rose64 (talk) 12:27, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Kodavision 2400 series first edition of Video-8mm camcorder Febuary 1984 with the first edition model 20 1932 also launched by Kodak and also in colour.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:04, 19 January 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Kodavision 2400 series first edition of Video-8mm camcorder Febuary 1984 with the first edition model 20 1932 also launched by Kodak and also in colour.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Probably fraudulent claim of own work. Uploader claims "self-made file", but the "Kodak model 20" insert was clearly taken from this eBay listing. Uploader has run into several COPYVIO issues recently with similar images. Jeh (talk) 05:51, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Uploader has a history of uploading non-free images created by others under a fraudulent claim of "own work", both here and at Commons. -- Red rose64 (talk) 12:27, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Annie Hall -1.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:14, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Annie Hall -1.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Another copy of this photo shows a 1977 copyright to United Artists. We hope (talk) 14:46, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:EUTooManyStars.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:14, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * File:EUTooManyStars.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * See previous discussion Possibly_unfree_files/2013_November_4, the suggestion was to correct the licence and transfer to Commons, however Commons have determined the statements on the description page not sufficient and have deleted the image as copyvio so that option can not be pursued anymore. Unsure how to proceed given it's unlinked in en.wiki. Cube00 (talk) 15:24, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * If none of speedy deletion criteria apply, you can send it to WP:FFD as an orphan image. -- Red rose64 (talk) 16:11, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Highams Park Lak.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:14, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Highams Park Lak.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Google's cache suggests that this is the same as Commons:File:Highams Park Lake Waltham Forest London.JPG, which seems to have been deleted by User:Sven Manguard for copyright reasons. Stefan2 (talk) 20:48, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

File:Betacam SP 1990's.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:14, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Betacam SP 1990& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:Older Betamax camacorder and recorders.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).
 * File:Pansaonic Video Home System Compact 4 inch LCD and integrated video light VHSC.tif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This user mainly/only seems to upload copyvios, so maybe we should assume that the three remaining images also are unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 20:49, 18 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the images's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.