Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 March 19



File:Lydia Trueblood.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete
 * File:Lydia Trueblood.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This file might be free for other reasons, but the current licensing claim of "this work has been released into the public domain by its author, Murderpedia" does not seem accurate for a 1920 mugshot. —Bagumba (talk) 00:06, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:10 Franga.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete
 * File:10 Franga.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Missing information about the photograph. When uploading a photograph of a coin, it is necessary to document who the photographer is and make sure that he has granted a free licence for his photograph. Stefan2 (talk) 01:34, 19 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Not at all. "The official position of the Wikimedia Foundation is that all reproductions of public domain works should be considered to be in the public domain regardless of their country of origin". The photo is such a reproduction of a public domain work. Huon (talk) 23:34, 19 March 2014 (UTC)


 * The context of that statement from PD-art is that it refers to reproductions of two-dimensional works, per the preceding sentence: "a mere photograph of an out-of-copyright two-dimensional work may not be protected under American copyright law". This doesn't cover a coin as it is a three-dimensional object, as clarified by Mike Godwin when he was the WMF counsel (see Wikipedia talk:Non-free content/Archive 25). January  ( talk ) 08:30, 20 March 2014 (UTC)


 * Personally I'd have thought that the face of a coin is just as two-dimensional as an oil painting, but I defer to Mike Godwin's expert opinion. Huon (talk) 19:09, 20 March 2014 (UTC)


 * The nominator's assessment is consistent with Mike Godwin's response in this discussion (the same one I linked to before) to a question on whether photographs of coins are copyrightable: "The short answer is: yes, they are copyrightable by the person taking the photographs." This means we need a free license from the photographer and since the uploader didn't quote the source we have no evidence that the photo is freely licensed. January  ( talk ) 12:29, 4 May 2014 (UTC) Note: this comment was in response to another comment that has since been removed.  January  ( talk ) 10:08, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bokros Lajos.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete
 * File:Bokros Lajos.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * deleted on the source wikipedia as lacking permission or source and appears to have been deleted from Commons as a copyright violation. Peripitus (Talk) 10:53, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete absent evidence of permisson. —Psychonaut (talk) 14:20, 26 April 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Tom Welling (headshot).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Speedily deleted under CSD#F3
 * File:Tom Welling (headshot).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image taken off BEImages.net (http://www.beimages.net/search/?viah=Y&kw=Tom%2520Welling&pg_size=42&stk=N&search_action_desktop=&lkw=Matt%2520Baron%2520Welling&sft=%2Calone&iso=USA&order=oldest&pg=1) [9th from top], sorry no easier link, site requires login to download. The right for the Image is owned by a photographer for BEImages named "Matt Baron" Stemoc (talk) 13:49, 19 March 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.