Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 November 22



File:Karuna Parekh.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete under CSD F9. m.o.p 22:26, 29 November 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Karuna Parekh.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Says "shot by ishan nair" which makes the license tag false. Eeekster (talk) 02:17, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Yi Zhou picture.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:04, 30 November 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Yi Zhou picture.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Doesn't appear to be the work of the uploader as claimed. EXIF: "Copyright holder OLIVIER BORDEo.borde64@gmail.com+336 07 95 04 65" Eeekster (talk) 02:25, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sri krishna committee.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  18:16, 14 December 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Sri krishna committee.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Source id The Hindu newspaper uploader is unlikely to be the copyright holder. Rotten regard 20:04, 22 November 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.