Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 October 12



File:Taipei 101 skyline.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:17, 14 October 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Taipei 101 skyline.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Following the permission link only shows the photographer gave permission to put the photo on Wikipedia, but does not explicitly grant any particular license. Kelly  hi! 16:49, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carlsson Pan Am 103.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:01, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Carlsson Pan Am 103.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Immediate source is another wiki which gives no information about the original source or copyright status of this image. January  ( talk ) 19:26, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * WikiSpooks Creative Commons Attribution is set out here.--Ecophriendly (talk) 21:19, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * That licence would only be valid if the uploader at Wikispooks is the copyright holder of this image, which seems unlikely. January  ( talk ) 19:59, 17 October 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. Per the nomination. It can be noted that the file includes two photographs. No information is provided about the original source of either. A look at the WikiSpooks user's uploads shows that it is not plausible that he would be the original source and copyright owner of all the files he uploaded there. And he doesn't claim to be. -- Asclepias (talk) 00:17, 19 October 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.