Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 October 31



File:Velva Darnell.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete no response to OTRS ticket after 3 weeks. If ticket is resolved, image can be restored.
 * File:Velva Darnell.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Appears to be a studio head shot. No evidence the upload owns the copyright. Eeekster (talk) 02:34, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * This photo was taken at a Glamour Shots Location. When we purchased the photo we bought the High Resolution Image which includes the copyright.  Maybe I have it tagged wrong as Free CC 3.0?  Here is a URL to their brochure show the "High Resolution" package we bought (Under Digital Images: High Resolution):  http://www.glamourshots.com/store_sheet/15322.pdf  --Microbolt (talk) 17:35, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * You need to get an OTRS ticket in place on the image. The instructions are at WP:Consent. -- Diannaa (talk) 15:48, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Thanks Diannaa for the information on the direction to take. I've sent the email and added the OTRS tag to the image.  Should I take the puf tag off the image?  Or wait until everything is squared away with the OTRS?  Thanks!  Microbolt (talk) 22:39, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:MattEllis2014.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:13, 9 November 2014 (UTC)
 * File:MattEllis2014.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Sourced as "Commissioned photographer" and the artist's website which conflicts with license claim. Eeekster (talk) 02:41, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Twenty+20+first+look.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  23:01, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Twenty+20+first+look.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Contain no license, and this is a fake fan made re-edited poster of the original film poster. So it's also a misleading image, the uploder was previously blocked for edit waring in related case. Wiki-senator 20:04, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 20:15, 1 November 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.