Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2014 September 30



File:George in Venice.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:09, 12 October 2014 (UTC)
 * File:George in Venice.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 *  Edgars2007  (talk/contribs) 11:24, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * What is the rationale? --Stefan2 (talk) 15:54, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * This is not the rationale, but to me it looks like a screenshot. -- Edgars2007  (talk/contribs) 19:08, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * No source, no author, no permission; use precautionary principal and delete. ww2censor (talk) 22:57, 4 October 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Belle Knox 2014.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by AnomieBOT ⚡  21:12, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * File:Belle Knox 2014.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The wiki page for the license says "no derivatives". The flick page says no derivs, and noncommercial. (2.0)

I do not believe this is a valid wiki license. Gaijin42 (talk) 18:41, 30 September 2014 (UTC)
 * Flickr lists this as "Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 2.0 Generic (CC BY-NC-ND 2.0)" which is not allowed on WikiMediaCommons per Commons:Liscensing. This file was uploaded to EN.Wikipedia so WP:C would apply and that doesn't allow this license (see: WP: Non-Free Creative Commons Liscenses). Therefore, this should be deleted. Calebrw (talk) 23:13, 30 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I thought it was allowed since it was a non-commercial use, but if it's not then delete it. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:22, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia's use is probably commercial when the annual donation campaigns are running. In any case, non-free licences are not acceptable. See db-f3. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:54, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.