Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 August 1



File:Mark Blatchford BBQ Champ Judge.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:12, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Mark Blatchford BBQ Champ Judge.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader is claiming to be copyright holder, but has done so with his two other uploads which were copyright violations. A google reverse image search seems to indicate this was a profile picture from Mark Blatchford's twitter.  Note that the profile picture is not that, but in the time when I first looked at this and now (a span of 3 hours), the profile picture was changed. Whpq (talk) 01:09, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BrokerBillLorge.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:04, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * File:BrokerBillLorge.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Suspected copyright issue - http://badgerlandmls.com/broker/ EricEnfermero (Talk) 07:13, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Uploader appears to be sock puppet of prior user blocked for copyright violations, see here.  JohnInDC (talk) 02:29, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:GeraldDLorge.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:04, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * File:GeraldDLorge.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Appears at http://www.ourcampaigns.com/CandidateDetail.html?CandidateID=160937 - no rationale for public domain/fair use. The entry was page protected for a week due to copyvio issues; that page protection expired in the last day or so. EricEnfermero (Talk) 07:18, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Uploader appears to be sock puppet of prior user blocked for copyright violations, see here.  JohnInDC (talk) 02:29, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Attractions of sonbhadra.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  14:07, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Attractions of sonbhadra.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is a collage of images that has copyrighted photos included. The uploader is claiming "These places are near to my home town. I went there and captured pictures using my mobile phone camera." However, this is a lie.  These types of collages have been deleted previously here on Wikipedia (see []) where two versions were deleted.  Uploader also attempted to upload this to Commons (see [Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Kartiktiwary3 this]) where it was deleted.  For the commons deletion, the uploader tried to claim the following .  However, as can be seen from this panaramio image, there is a much higher res version that does not belong to the uploader, and taken with a pint and shoot not a mobile phone.  This image from a blog has the lettering on it.  The uploader's previous attempts didn't completely crop out the lettering.  They did a better job this time, but it's still a copyright violation. Whpq (talk) 14:32, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Update - Another editor has identified the temple in the image being sourced to this photographer's site which has a clear higher resolution image. -- Whpq (talk) 02:37, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Vijaygarh Maingate.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:06, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Vijaygarh Maingate.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This editor has lied about taking pictures himself. See Possibly unfree files/2015 August 1.  Given that he has repeatedly, and explicitly claimed to have personally taken photos which are demonstrably copyright violations, there is no good reason to believe that he is telling the truth for these images. Whpq (talk) 14:35, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * See also File:Robertsganj Eco Point.jpg nominated below. -- Whpq (talk) 14:41, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Robertsganj Eco Point.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:06, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Robertsganj Eco Point.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This editor has lied about taking pictures himself. See Possibly unfree files/2015 August 1.  Given that he has repeatedly, and explicitly claimed to have personally taken photos which are demonstrably copyright violations, there is no good reason to believe that he is telling the truth for these images. Whpq (talk) 14:38, 1 August 2015 (UTC)
 * See also File:Vijaygarh Maingate.jpg nominated above. -- Whpq (talk) 14:41, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

The Vijaygarh Fort is 23km from my home and eco point is in my hometown. I went there with my frnds. I captured these images using my old mobile phone Samsung star 3 s53222. The phone has low megapixel camera. So there resolution is low. I declare that i did not copy these images from any website. It is captured by my using my mobile phone. These places are open to public. These are not private property. So anyone can go there and capture photos. There is some chances of light similarity in pictures but there is no copyright violation. So i request you to please delete it from the deletion nomination. kartiktiwary3 (talk) 02:41, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * You have made the same claim for the collage of photos, and I and other editors here and on commons have found the exact same images in higher resolutions. Not similar, but exact angles, framing, everything.  How do you explain that? You have also laid claim to other inidividual images that have been deleted.  -- Whpq (talk) 02:45, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

I didn't clam that for File:attractions of sonbhadra.jpeg  because some of pictures in the collage of attractions in Sonbhadra.jpg is collected from my friends.

But the File: Vijaygarh Maingate.jpg and file: Robertsganj_Eco_Point.jpg  is personally. Captured by me. So i request don't delete the. Vijaygarh Maingate.jpg. And Robertsganj Eco Point.jpg. And please free from these 2 images from the deletion nomination. kartiktiwary3 (talk) 03:11, 2 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The file description from the collage states "These places are near to my home town. I went there and captured pictures using my mobile phone camera." which directly contradicts what you just said. -- Whpq (talk) 03:38, 2 August 2015 (UTC)

That was a statement mistake. I went there with my friends. Some of pictures in the collage of attractions in Sonbhadra.jpg is collected from my friends mobile phone and some of them from my mobile phone.

But i declare you that the pictures of file Vijaygarh Maingate.jpg and File Robertsganj Eco Point.jpg  are personaly captured by my. You will never find the copy of these 2 images because there is no copyright violation. these 2 pictures are my pictures. So i request you to please remove these 2 pictures File :Vijaygarh Maingate.jpg and file:Robertsganj Eco Point.jpg  from the possibily unfree files tag. kartiktiwary3 (talk) 02:30, 3 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Note - This editor subsequently uploaded File:Veer Lorik Stone.jpg claiming it was his work when it was in fact somebody else's. How can we rely on anything thos editor claims when  he freely lies about whether the images are his own work? -- Whpq (talk) 04:51, 19 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.