Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 August 28



File:Wild logo 03.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:06, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Wild logo 03.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * File is claimed as "own work" and is licensed using " Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0", but it supposed to be the former logo of radio station DXWT and there is no OTRS permission, etc. provided that verifies the uploader is the original copyright holder or created the work themselves. Marchjuly (talk) 07:06, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lite 929.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. File is PD-logo. No remaining advocates of deletion. (non-admin closure) BethNaught (talk) 11:52, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Lite 929.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * File is listed as "own work" but it is supposed to be a former logo of the radio station CFLT-FM and there's no OTRS permission or any other information provided that verifies the uploader is the original copyright holder. Marchjuly (talk) 07:17, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Logo does not meet threshold of originality. License should according to changed to PD-logo. Source can be found here (at the bottom). — ξ xplicit  07:00, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * That's fine. Can I go ahead and change the licensing or should I wait until the discussion is formally closed? - Marchjuly (talk) 07:17, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * You can change the licensing and withdraw your nomination for a speedier result. —  ξ xplicit  20:22, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Understand . I changed the file's licensing per your suggestion. If you notice any mistakes, please let me know and I'll fix them asap. Thanks again. - Marchjuly (talk) 21:53, 12 September 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment: Per above discussion, file's licensing has been changed to "PD-logo". As the original PUF nominator, I believe this change is sufficient to remove the doubts I had about the file's "free" status. - Marchjuly (talk) 21:56, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ckdh logo-2011.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Kept Copyright tag corrected. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:24, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Ckdh logo-2011.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No indication that the uploader is the original copyright holder of this radio station logo - Marchjuly (talk) 07:22, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Logo does not meet threshold of originality. License should according to changed to PD-logo. Source can be found here — ξ xplicit  07:00, 11 September 2015 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ezrock capitalfm.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  08:06, 11 September 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Ezrock capitalfm.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * For similar reasons given above regarding similar files uploaded by same editor. There is no indication that editor is the original copyright holder of this radio station logo. Marchjuly (talk) 07:27, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:1011morefmlogo.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: converted to fair use. Diannaa (talk) 22:34, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * File:1011morefmlogo.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image is licensed using "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 3.0" and uploader is claiming to be the copyright holder, but there is no evidence of that this is the case, such as OTRS permission, provided. In addtion, source given for image is this radio station website which clearly states "WBEB-FM Radio. All rights reserved." at the bottom of the page. Marchjuly (talk) 13:13, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.