Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 December 14



File:Arriva logo.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: convert to fair use and allow use in both Arriva and Arriva UK Trains. There is an unresolved dispute regarding the symbol on the left side of the logo and whether it meets the threshold of originality. Erring to the side of caution, this is best tagged as a non-free file. In regards to its usage, User:Cloudbound correctly pointed out that there was a lack of support to removing this image from the latter of the aforementioned articles; User:TLSuda's closure of didn't even remotely reflect consensus. Two separate comments there even cited a precedent that would allow this image being used in more than one article because the circumstances were essentially the same. No convincing argument suggested that this image violates WP:NFC at NFCR, and none were provided in this discussion. — ξ xplicit  02:12, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Arriva logo.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Bogus PD tag. The symbol to the left of the text is more complex than File:Prince logo.svg and, which are both copyrighted according to the United States Copyright Office. The PD tag seems to have been added because a user is unhappy about WP:NFC §17 and its application in Non-free content review/Archive 62. Stefan2 (talk) 15:01, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Your interpretation of NFC#UUI §17 in this regard is incorrect in my option. Cloudbound (talk) 18:58, 16 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Unfree per Stefan2. The PD tag was motivated by nothing but Cloudbound's dissatisfaction with the outcome of the NFCR and its subsequent enforcement by Stefan2. Finnusertop (talk &#124; guestbook &#124; contribs) 00:13, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * More because I looked at it and decided it fitted with the PD-ineligible tag. Cloudbound (talk) 16:51, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Also, the non-free content review linked by Stefan2 does not result in a definitive conclusion following the discussion. The only responses are to question whether it really is a fair use image, and no one agrees with Stefan2 except the closing admin TLSuda. Hardly resounding. Cloudbound (talk) 14:53, 23 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SACperform.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:02, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:SACperform.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Video capture: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufdEtaWzG-o Eeekster (talk) 22:20, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - clearly bogus public domain claim. -- Whpq (talk) 00:05, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.