Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 December 17



File:UWStout.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 08:06, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:UWStout.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The lines at the top of the file seem to be a unique and an identifier for the subject of the file. The "paint lines" most likely make this file unique enough to be eligible for copyright. Steel1943  (talk) 02:15, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Matrix Realty Group, Inc. Corporate Center Danbury, Connecticut.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:12, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Matrix Realty Group, Inc. Corporate Center Danbury, Connecticut.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Something untoward is going on here. On File:Matrix Realty Group, Inc. Corporate Center Danbury, Connecticut.jpg, it is claimed that the image was sent personally to the uploader by the author Glen Nelson.  On the duplicate file page File:Matrix Corporate Center Danbury, Connecticut.jpg, it is claimed that "This is the CEO - i took the photo."  On Commons at commons:File:Matrix Corporate Center Danbury, CT.jpg it is sourced as "Own work".  Either the user behind the account has simultaneously claimed that Glen Nelson created it and then claimed self-work, or the initial uploader allowed someone else to use their account (WP:Shared accounts) to log in and say "This is the CEO - i took the photo".  The picture is low resolution, unlikely to have been produced by a modern camera and more likely taken from a website, which makes me doubt a self-work claim. Nick&#8288;—&#8288;Contact/Contribs 05:28, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ahmed Raza.tiff

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:12, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Ahmed Raza.tiff ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Apparently improper PD-art tag. Since the sandbox article this image is used in says that the subject was born "August 9, 1991 (age 24)", I don't think the original artwork was published before 1923. Nick&#8288;—&#8288;Contact/Contribs 17:14, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mallika Sarabhai.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:12, 25 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Mallika Sarabhai.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Extensive prior publication online (including http://sayfty.com/tag/mallika-sarabhai/ - see reverse Google search for more). Uploader's date in the information template doesn't match the date taken according to EXIF data. Self-work claim needs to be verified. Nick&#8288;—&#8288;Contact/Contribs 17:16, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Stellenbosch DivCo CoA 2.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. Thanks Stefan2 for finding the reference in Commons that proves these files free. Steel1943 (talk) 00:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Stellenbosch DivCo CoA 2.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This file is most likely a derivative work, but I am unable to find an image online that specifically represents the "Stellenbosch Divisional Council" which this file is meant to represent (so I cannot find a file to compare with.) Steel1943  (talk) 18:18, 17 December 2015 (UTC)

This file is not a derivative work. I created the image myself, based on the blazon of the arms, specifically to illustrate this section of the article. Arthur R (talk) 19:24, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * According to c:COM:COA, the blazon is in the public domain, so the deletion rationale looks incorrect. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:14, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Paarl CoA 2.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. Thanks Stefan2 for finding the reference in Commons that proves these files free. Steel1943 (talk) 00:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Paarl CoA 2.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This file is most likely a derivative work, but I am unable to find an image online that specifically represents Paarl, which this file is meant to represent (so I cannot find a file to compare with.) Steel1943  (talk) 18:21, 17 December 2015 (UTC)


 * This file is not a derivative work. I created the image myself, based on the blazon of the arms, specifically to illustrate this section of the article. Arthur R (talk) 19:25, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * According to c:COM:COA, the blazon is in the public domain, so the deletion rationale looks incorrect. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:13, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Worcester DivCo-CoA.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. Thanks Stefan2 for finding the reference in Commons that proves these files free. Steel1943 (talk) 00:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Worcester DivCo-CoA.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This file is most likely a derivative work, but I am unable to find an image online that specifically represents the subject which this file is meant to represent (so I cannot find a file to compare with.) Steel1943  (talk) 18:23, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * This file is not a derivative work. I created the image myself, based on the blazon of the arms, specifically to illustrate this section of the article. Arthur R (talk) 19:25, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * According to c:COM:COA, the blazon is in the public domain, so the deletion rationale looks incorrect. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:13, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:George DivCo-CoA.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn. Thanks Stefan2 for finding the reference in Commons that proves these files free. Steel1943 (talk) 00:56, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:George DivCo-CoA.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This file is most likely a derivative work, but I am unable to find an image online that specifically represents the subject which this file is meant to represent (so I cannot find a file to compare with.) Steel1943  (talk) 18:24, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * This file is not a derivative work. I created the image myself, based on the blazon of the arms, specifically to illustrate this section of the article. Arthur R (talk) 19:25, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep all Steel1943's nominations of Arthur R's files per Arthur's explanation above. Finnusertop (talk &#124; guestbook &#124; contribs) 22:50, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
 * According to c:COM:COA, the blazon is in the public domain, so the deletion rationale looks incorrect. --Stefan2 (talk) 22:13, 20 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.