Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 December 5



File:Radical Party Ukraine.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep and convert to fair use. — ξ xplicit  01:03, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Radical Party Ukraine.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This does not fit cases (a) and (b). Cases (c) to (f) only seem to cover government works, but a political party is an entity which is separated from the government, so those cases do not seem to apply either. This seems to be a non-free logo. Stefan2 (talk) 00:10, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:The first Violet Gray appearance in Peanuts.gif

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:The first Violet Gray appearance in Peanuts.gif ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Public domain reason given is invalid. However it's from 1950s America so it may be PD for another reason. Thoughts? BethNaught (talk) 12:52, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * It has a copyright notice, so unless evidence is provided of failure to renew the copyright it should be deleted. January  ( talk ) 10:30, 12 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Violet Gray in her violet dress.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Violet Gray in her violet dress.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Invalid PD reason BethNaught (talk) 12:52, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lauren DeStefano Portrait.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Lauren DeStefano Portrait.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Ambiguous license statement at source - the subject merely says "this file is released under a free license and may be used publicly". No mention of what license that is, though it's not public domain as claimed on the image description page. Kelly  hi! 14:37, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:New old presto.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:New old presto.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Derivative of non-free product packaging - no license given for the packaging itself. Kelly  hi! 15:05, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Samantha Katz Bio Photo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F11 by AnomieBOT ⚡  20:11, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Samantha Katz Bio Photo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Appears to be a possible case of flickrwashing the license. Image is a profile image of the individual that has been used on her linkedin page.  Evidence for release to public domain is weak. Whpq (talk) 15:50, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * This is the same photo as File:Samantha Katz biography photo 2015.jpg which was deleted as lacking evidence of permission on May 2015. -- Diannaa (talk) 18:47, 5 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.