Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 December 6



File:Eileen Sharp - Count Michael de Torby.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep. File is now marked as non-free, and is therefore ineligible for deletion through this venue. — ξ xplicit  01:10, 24 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Eileen Sharp - Count Michael de Torby.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The year in the artist's signature appears to be 1924 not 1922. January  ( talk ) 12:08, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for that - didn't spot that. I have changed the rationale to cover this. The image was made available by the family, who own the original and who sent a copy of it to me in an email giving permission for its use. I can confirm all this. Jack1956 (talk) 15:16, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I see you've put a fair use rationale on it, but there are two public domain images of her so this would fail WP:NFCC. I think the only way this could be kept is with WP:OTRS confirmation that the artist's heirs have given permission for it to be released under a free licence. January  ( talk ) 15:49, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't think I know how to do that. Jack1956 (talk) 16:23, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * The artist's heirs would need to e-mail permissions-en@wikimedia.org confirming that they wish to release the image to the public domain or under a free licence. A suggested wording can be found at WP:CONSENT. January  ( talk ) 17:52, 7 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Ok, I'll ask them to do that. Jack1956 (talk) 21:48, 7 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Permission to use the image has been emailed to Permissions. Jack1956 (talk) 12:35, 15 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 16:11, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Freedom Trophy.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  02:01, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Freedom Trophy.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * All other photos by this uploader have been grabbed from various websites, so this is probably also the case with this photo. Also, the cup is non-free. Stefan2 (talk) 12:20, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Eileen Sharp Iolanthe Signed.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Eileen Sharp Iolanthe Signed.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image appears at dated 1924 not 1922 as per the description page, with the author credited as Sasha (Alexander Stewart, d. 1953) making it unfree in both the UK and US.  January  ( talk ) 17:06, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
 * I have changed the licence accordingly. Jack1956 (talk) 00:37, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * This fails WP:NFCC as a non-free image as there is a PD image in the article (and three here if the licence of that one is questioned.) January  ( talk ) 17:48, 7 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Yes, but this one was specifically requested by the family. Jack1956 (talk) 23:57, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * NFC policy does not make any provision for that. January  ( talk ) 18:00, 8 December 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 01:02, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.