Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 February 1



File:Bolkan-Indagine.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:04, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Bolkan-Indagine.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * see c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Florinda Bolkan-Indagine.jpg Magog the Ogre (t • c) 03:09, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:05, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Broken Rain Gutter.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:09, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Broken Rain Gutter.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Unclear if uploader is copyright holder. Photo is attributed to Gavin Brett. Kelly  hi! 08:42, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The camera info matches his other upload, File:TallFlowerSpike.JPG. -- Diannaa (talk) 01:55, 14 February 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:TimorPauloMartins.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  13:09, 3 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:TimorPauloMartins.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This image is a crop from the origional. See a small copy of the origional here. No exif, web resolution, no listed provenance (date, time, location) for the image. Uploader's history shows a lot of images deleted as copyright violations Peripitus (Talk) 09:09, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jerra.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted - RHS image is a downscaled version of the main photo from here. Image is self-assembled rather than self-taken - Peripitus (Talk) 22:45, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Jerra.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Web resolution, limited contrib history of uploader. No evidence this is the copyright holder. Kelly  hi! 13:25, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Gobstoppers.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  05:03, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Gobstoppers.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This file consists primarily of a non-free label. —Granger (talk · contribs) 15:41, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Original Hoffman Electronics Brand Logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: PD-ineligible. Retagged as such. --B (talk) 18:59, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Original Hoffman Electronics Brand Logo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Unlikely the uploader is the copyright holder. Ron h jones (Talk) 17:48, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


 * This image consists purely of text, so it can surely be kept with . —Granger (talk · contribs) 19:03, 1 February 2015 (UTC)


 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:Non-free content review. AnomieBOT ⚡ 15:12, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

This may help clear up the dispute of the copy right status of this LOGO.

The Hoffman brand and corporate operations ceased after the Gould takeover of the majority of Hoffman assets back in the 1970s. The remainder of Hoffman retained by his son-in-law no longer used the logo.

Engradio (talk) 03:52, 27 July 2015 (UTC)

File:Mahmoud Said painting-Recto-Village.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Image seems to be PD-Egypt.  TLSuda  (talk) 14:35, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Mahmoud Said painting-Recto-Village.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Wrong license for 1923 image Ron h jones (Talk) 18:51, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Surely this is PD-Egypt - Peripitus (Talk) 22:47, 17 April 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sheila Rogers.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  00:01, 28 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Sheila Rogers.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Invalid reason for PD claim. Eeekster (talk) 21:38, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.