Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 January 15



File:David Gregory new.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:David Gregory new.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * EXIF: "Copyright holder Marissa Rauch Photography" Eeekster (talk) 01:07, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Winifred Dunn.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Winifred Dunn.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Invalid PD reason ("Photo used for online film project"). More information would be needed on the origin of this photo to determine if it is public domain. January  ( talk ) 08:40, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Canadian daily newspapers circulation by province (2011).pdf

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Canadian daily newspapers circulation by province (2011).pdf ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Invalid PD reason ("There is no explicit claim to copyright on the Newspapers Canada website"), copyright protection is automatic. January  ( talk ) 11:03, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Canadian newspapers' circulation by ownership.pdf

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Canadian newspapers& ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * PD reason given as ("This report is freely available on the Newspapers Canada website"). Souirce is now a dead link but archive.org shows the website had a copyright notice . January  ( talk ) 11:06, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Thorcon nuclear island.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep. Source website now shows a cc-by-sa license. Diannaa (talk) 02:01, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Thorcon nuclear island.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This image, which was uploaded to Wikipedia today, appears to have been taken from the http://thorconpower.com website; the footer of the homepage indicates that the website material is licensed under CC-BY-ND, which is not compatible with Wikipedia. -- SoCalSuperEagle ( talk ) 18:37, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi all,

The owner of the Thorconpower website is Jack Devanney. He has given explicit permission to use the images and written content. He wrote me this: "everything on the web site is under the Creative Commons, Attribution, Share Alike license which i think is very similar to what Wikipedia uses."

Is this not the case?Siphon06 (talk) 19:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.