Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 January 23



File:Filigree.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

Delete. Derivative work of potentially copyrighted model. (Incidentally, it's illegal to distribute photos of the Eiffel Tower unless they were taken during the day, as those taken at night include its distinctive lighting style which is copyrighted under French law.) Stifle (talk) 14:12, 26 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Filigree.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is a derivative work. Stefan2 (talk) 00:02, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * This photo was taken by me from an item that I own, And I uploaded it to Wikipedia.
 * Bloger (talk) 06:34, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * But the fact that you own the item doesn't mean that you created the item. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:59, 27 January 2015 (UTC)
 * and? Bloger (talk) 06:11, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * As stated, this is a derivative work. As there is no evidence that you own the copyright to the underlying work, the file has to be assumed to be unfree. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:34, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * I’m sorry that I’m having a difficult time understanding the problem with the file. Would you be so kind and elaborate further? First, how would one know that its derivative work? Secondly, if we assume that it is derivative work, is a photo of such work not permitted on Wikipedia? Bloger (talk) 02:31, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 * As you have not created the horse and the carriage, you need to obtain permission from the one who created those things. --Stefan2 (talk) 17:22, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * permission to do what? Bloger (talk) 06:39, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Without permission from the person who created the horse and the carriage, you can't distribute photos of the horse and the carriage. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:14, 13 February 2015 (UTC)
 * So you mean to tell me that I can’t – for instance – put a photo on the Eiffel tower on Wikipedia since I didn’t build it? Bloger (talk) 05:05, 15 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The Eiffel Tower is okay to photograph, as its copyright has expired. However, there's no freedom of panorama in France, not even for buildings and bridges, so we have to be really careful. What Stefan2 is trying to say in his own opaque way is that the object in the photograph may be subject to copyright, and it's up to you to prove that it is not. WP:derivative works. -- Diannaa (talk) 02:33, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * So just to make sure I understand clearly. Even if an object is not 2D – 2D as in a painting - I’m prohibited under copyright law from photographing it, or at least posting it on Wikipedia right? Bloger (talk) 03:19, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * It depends on the object, and whether it is a work of art or just an ordinary thing like a chair or such (although some artsy chairs might be under copyright!). Photos of copyrighted toys (such as Elmo) are not allowed either. Do you know the age of the object? -- Diannaa (talk) 03:30, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Finish.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Finish.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * What is this? A screenshot from a computer game? Stefan2 (talk) 00:06, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:First Cav Army Mon.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:First Cav Army Mon.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:First Cav Army Mon.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 00:10, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flag icon.svg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep. It's highly unlikely that this is not the uploader's own work. Diannaa (talk) 02:44, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Flag icon.svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The source and author information was added by in Special:Diff/562368535. Unfortunately, he didn't tell where he found the information, so it isn't possible to tell whether the information is correct. Stefan2 (talk) 00:25, 23 January 2015 (UTC)


 * Assumed in good faith it was user creation. No contest if it turns out that it isn't Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:55, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * We can typically only assume that it was the user's own creation if the user says so. --Stefan2 (talk) 15:04, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flitzer.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Flitzer.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is a derivative work of non-free art on an attraction at an amusement part. Stefan2 (talk) 00:34, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Svetlana Antonova, 2011.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Svetlana Antonova, 2011.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * EXIF contains copyright notice. Eeekster (talk) 03:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:BB Best of.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:BB Best of.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This image is used, in a less cropped higher resolution format, as the cover of the Album "The Best of Brenda Best" - see here. At the least we need a permissions email. Peripitus (Talk) 09:56, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Nicolae.jpeg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Keep, pending ourtcome of OTRS correspondence. Diannaa (talk) 02:42, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Nicolae.jpeg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).

I've already sent an standard email in which it is stated that the copyrights holder allows to use this picture. Adys16 (talk) 19:38, 6 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Image is credited in the exif data to Angels Photography Peripitus (Talk) 10:20, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Raviteja at balupu movie shooting in vizag.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 24 February 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Raviteja at balupu movie shooting in vizag.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Looks like this was cropped from a larger image and considering the uploader's history of copyright violations I doubt he actually shot the image himself as claimed. Eeekster (talk) 22:27, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.