Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 July 30



File:DEATHTRAPDUNGEON.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Deleted. There's a copy of File:Starship traveller map.jpg on the Commons, and I have nominated it for deletion as well. Diannaa (talk) 19:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)


 * File:DEATHTRAPDUNGEON.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The map is a derivative work of the fictional world created in a non-free gamebook; it is immaterial whether the user created the map. RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 04:12, 30 July 2015 (UTC)

Also nominated here are the following images: RJaguar3 &#124; u &#124; t 04:26, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Deathtrapdungeonmap.jpg
 * File:WARLOCKOFFIRETOPMOUNTAIN.jpg
 * File:Warlockoffiretopmountainmap.jpg
 * File:Freewayfightermap.jpg
 * File:Creatureofhavoc.jpg
 * File:Trialofchampionsmap.jpg
 * File:Curseofthemummymap.jpg
 * File:Houseofhellmap.jpg
 * File:Templeofterrormap.jpg
 * File:Cavernsofthesnowwitchmap.jpg
 * File:Citadelofchaosmap.jpg
 * File:Starship traveller map.jpg
 * File:Cot gamebook map.jpg
 * File:Scorpionswamp.jpg
 * File:CITADELOFCHAOS.jpg
 * File:TEMPLEOFTERROR.jpg
 * File:Forest of doom map.jpg
 * File:TRIALOFCHAMPIONS.jpg
 * File:CREATUREOFHAVOC.jpg
 * File:FREEWAYFIGHTER.jpg
 * File:HOUSEOFHELL.jpg
 * File:CURSEOFTHEMUMMY.jpg
 * Delete. Yep, derivative of some kind of manual. Uploader would need to show that they have the permission of the copyright holder. – czar   18:02, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mamta kulkarni.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F9 by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Mamta kulkarni.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * I can't seem to find the original source of this file, but it's a crop of this image which is likely a still from a film. &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  17:44, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Promo photo likely not authored by uploader., could have just tagged as no source—would have been easier. – czar   18:00, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Robert-dw-connor.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: withdrawn –  czar   20:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Robert-dw-connor.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This drawing is signed by its author and has no immediate confirmation that it is the work of the Federal Government. It is assumed to be a work of the Federal Gov because it's on archives.gov? If so, is there a better template this should be using? – czar   17:48, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * The file is included in the National Archives Catalog at Conner pic. The catalog entry indicates no access or use (i.e. copyright) restrictions.--Pubdog (talk) 20:38, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * NARA-image is what I was looking for. The file's author should be listed as "General Services Administration. National Archives and Records Service. Office of Educational Programs. Education Division." per the source. The old link was a bare URL that didn't verify that the file was made by the US gov. – czar   20:57, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Lavrio bc logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: converted to fair use. Diannaa (talk) 19:51, 17 August 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Lavrio bc logo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader is claiming this logo as his own work and being the copyright holder. Highly unlikely. A look at the link in the infobox of the article for the basketball team who uses this logo shows a slightly different logo in use so it's not clear that this would be the right image to use as a logo anyways. Whpq (talk) 19:25, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Agreed. Keep and convert to fair use. (edit conflict) The "official site" listed was actually for another team. The "Λαυρίου" in the logo is likely Lavrio for the team—I'd keep it. – czar   19:32, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Yes, the link at the bottom of the article appears to be wrong, but I meant the link in the infobox which is http://basketlavriofan.blogspot.gr/2015/05/73-72.html but I now realize it some sort of fan blog and not an official site. I was originally going to convert to fair use and add a rationale, but I was fooled by the blog thinking it was an official site, the logo in the background is different from the one we have.  If we can verify that this is indeed the logo, I'll happily withdraw this nomination and convert the licensing on the file to fair use for a logo. -- Whpq (talk) 19:39, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Unfortunately, it's all Greek (to me) and I can't find an official site but it does appear to be on their jerseys. – czar   20:19, 30 July 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.