Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 June 9



File:New Math popular paperbacks.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  17:06, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
 * File:New Math popular paperbacks.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Photos of book covers from the 1960s. If any are still copyrighted, which is likely, those copyrights would prevent uploader's chosen license. (ESkog)(Talk) 06:19, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Swapped out the one above with cover illustrations for one that's just book spines. Maybe that's less of a copyright issue? Spines of New Math paperbacks from 1960s.jpg. LMK if I should change license to something better, as well. File:Spines of New Math paperbacks from 1960s.jpg jengod (talk) 18:53, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jeph Jacques chicken.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F3 by AnomieBOT ⚡  01:00, 10 June 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Jeph Jacques chicken.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader cites a tweet for sourcing, but there is no information there for public domain-licensing. —  fourthords  &#124; =Λ= &#124;  17:56, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per CSD F3 (non-commercial use only). The uploader now links to this source which lists the license as cc-by-nc-4.0, which is an invalid license per F3. So tagged. --Nick&#8288;—&#8288;Contact/Contribs 22:43, 9 June 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.