Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 March 27



File:Joss Lynam.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Joss Lynam.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * In reviewing the source for this image, I updated the url and notice the image has a cc-by-sa-1.0 attribution licence template. However, the text on the source webpage does not specifically provide that licence but states: "The photographs on this page may be used subject to the following licence, as long as you link to this (IMC presidents) page or explain how to find it:" Can we assume the prose supports this licence or should we consider it to be non-free? Personally I suspect all the images on that webpage are by many different photographers who probably never gave permission for their free use. I don't want to move it to the commons if we think it is non-free. ww2censor (talk) 13:35, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete: The copyright holder seems to be imposing an additional restriction to the cc-by-sa-1.0 license which is fundamentally incompatible with Wikipedia/Commons' application of said license. - F ASTILY 05:53, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Richfields.jpg.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  15:12, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Richfields.jpg.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Claimed to be own work, but the image is also available on Twitter. I can only find Twitter's thumbnail, though. Stefan2 (talk) 23:37, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.