Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 May 22



File:Glick.Joe.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:10, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Glick.Joe.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No enough of a source to verify the claim on public domain. Eeekster (talk) 00:52, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SollySeeman2.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:10, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * File:SollySeeman2.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Source shows publication date of 1968. Eeekster (talk) 01:12, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Contraalto Flute.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:10, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Contraalto Flute.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Likely professional photo, user's other uploads were questionable, copy appears here: http://web.archive.org/web/20110713153055/http://www.kingmaflutes.com/mySite/ca-41-452.jpg JesseW, the juggling janitor 06:44, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:A portrait of Prof Amar Agarwal.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:10, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * File:A portrait of Prof Amar Agarwal.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image is visible in larger format elsewhere on the internet (see here for example) Peripitus (Talk) 12:10, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Deik logo.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:10, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Deik logo.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * identical to the banner on this website: http://www.deik.org.tr/ Zombie45764 (talk) 12:30, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Protestors and police in Skopje, Macedonia, May 2015.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:10, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Protestors and police in Skopje, Macedonia, May 2015.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Bad licensing. Explained only as an Associated Press image, without giving the proper license making the work free-to-use. Possible copyright violation. - Phill24th (talk) . 15:06, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Bryan Art Screenshot.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F4 by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Bryan Art Screenshot.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Video screenshot. Eeekster (talk) 16:06, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Carol ammons headshot.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as F1 by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:08, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Carol ammons headshot.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Not a work of the US Government. Eeekster (talk) 19:57, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Huy Fong Foods Sriracha sauce.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  16:10, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Huy Fong Foods Sriracha sauce.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image was uploaded using a CC BY-SA 3.0 license. Photo is of bottles of a particular brand of sriracha sauce whose product packing is likely still under copyright. Rooster logo of company is distinct enough so that it would not be considered too simple to be excluded from copyright protection. It's highly likely that this photo would fail c:Commons:PACKAGING and, therefore, be ineligible for upload to Commons because it would be considered to be non-free. Marchjuly (talk) 22:02, 22 May 2015 (UTC)
 * This is quite likely fair use in the Sriracha sauce (Huy Fong Foods) article. The image just needs the appropriate verbiage and templates added. While it is not appropriate for Commons, it is fine as an upload here. JesseW, the juggling janitor 04:34, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * It's not clear to me exactly what verbiage would be appropriate for this sort of case, where a photograph of copyrighted packaging is being used. It is a derivative work of the packaging, and the uploader (presumably) created it by relying on fair use; it then has it's own copyright, which is released under a free license. Do we have some existing templates/boilerplate for this case? JesseW, the juggling janitor 04:46, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Thank you for the feedback . There was a similar, albiet a non-free use, file discussed at Non-free content review/Archive 63. This was also a photo taken of a bootle of the same company's sriracha sauce. The close of that discussion stated "Consensus is the image fails WP:NFCC and should be deleted." So, based upon this WP:NFCR, this image's use as a non-free is not so clear and should probably be discussed at WP:NFCR if it is determined here that the image is not free. - Marchjuly (talk) 14:47, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
 * That does seem pretty conclusive, and sensible. I have no objection to deleting this image on the basis that it depicts a non-freely-licensed logo, and exceeds our desired range of non-free-content (given that we have an image of the company logo by itself). JesseW, the juggling janitor 05:12, 26 May 2015 (UTC)


 * File uploader here. Would it be all right to have a image of the bottle that does not show the logo or other copyrighted imagery, like from the back side?--Prisencolinensinainciusol (talk) 22:47, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure. Perhaps such a file could be uploaded using a free license since the shape of the bottle itself is apparently not protected by copyright per c:Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter. The issue then would be not one of copyright status, but rather one of relevance. Would photo of the back of a bottle of the sauce (with no indication of the manufacturing company visible) really improve the reader's understanding to the point that not having said photo would be detrimental to that understanding? This is not only something required for non-free images per WP:NFCC, but also something that should be considered for all images. Images, like text, have to increase the reader's understanding of the subject matter. So, whether an image (even a free image) belongs in an article is often determined through consensus. Personally, I think what is needed is an image that is specific to the company's sriracha sauce, especially if the image is to be used in the infobox, that could be uploaded as a non-free logo per WP:LOGO. I've been trying to find something that can be used like the white label for the 8.5 lbs bottle shown here, but have had no luck so far. I think it would be better to find something that can be downloaded instead of simply taking a picture of it. It's possible that this image showing the Huy Fong "sriracha family" would be accepted as non-free, but it might be a good idea to ask at WP:NFCR first just to get the opinions of others. I can do that if you like, but you can do it as well. - Marchjuly (talk) 00:42, 28 May 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.