Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 November 20



File:Nibbles Woodaway.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep and add fair use rationale. — ξ xplicit  05:52, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Nibbles Woodaway.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Unclear whether the uploader is the copyright holder. Kelly  hi! 00:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I took that Nibbles picture and uploaded it. I never transferred the copyright to anyone else, so I assume that makes me the holder. I don't need the copyright for anything, but I couldn't find a way to make it more free after the initial upload (I didn't quite know what I was clicking at the time). Let me know if there's something I should do about it. Motmahp (talk) 20:39, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for clarifying the authorship of the photo - the other issue is that the Big Blue Bug is likely copyrighted and this file should probably be tagged with non-free 3D art and a fair use rationale added. Kelly  hi! 08:40, 8 December 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Quescilogo.jpg.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep and convert to fair use. — ξ xplicit  05:52, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Quescilogo.jpg.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * I'm not seeing why this is exempt, from c:Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory, is this exempt as the logo of a state agency? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:08, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * There is, but Wikipedia disagrees with Commons and calls the corresponding template . That said, I have no idea if this was created by the government or not. --Stefan2 (talk) 00:16, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:PSD logo (Mexico).svg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep and convert to fair use. It will be kept in Social Democratic Party (Mexico) and removed from all other instances. — ξ xplicit  05:52, 27 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:PSD logo (Mexico).svg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * I'm not sure this qualifies for the exemption, as it's a parties logo, not necessarily a symbol of a 'recognized' NGO. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:10, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Binh Phuoc FC logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Convert to fair use --Stefan2 (talk) 15:13, 26 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Binh Phuoc FC logo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * No obvious release into Public domain given at site. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:14, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Convert to fair use. BethNaught (talk) 11:10, 24 December 2015 (UTC)


 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IceBearsChamps.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:IceBearsChamps.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is a logo, being on facebook doesn't make it free. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:15, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:IceBearsLogo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:IceBearsLogo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is a logo, being on facebook doesn't make it free Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:16, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Saraju Mohanty Nanoelectronic Mixed-Signal System Design Book Cover 2015.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Saraju Mohanty Nanoelectronic Mixed-Signal System Design Book Cover 2015.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Uploader admits it is a photograph of the book, makes no assertion of being the owner of the design. This is a derivative copyvio. BethNaught (talk) 08:23, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Mykola Plaviuk.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:02, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Mykola Plaviuk.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Unable to locate image at given source. Kelly  hi! 18:02, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep. Source Link was added . It was archived a long time ago by the website, so I had to find an archive version of the article. But now everything is fixed. Permission is allowed by the website as long as it is properly attributed (see website footnote). § DDima 19:48, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Pinging for an opinion.  Kelly  hi! 19:51, 20 November 2015 (UTC)
 * The problem is that the word 'use' is too ambiguous. What is included in 'use'? Only verbatim copying, or also modification? Ambiguous licences such as this one are typically not accepted. --Stefan2 (talk) 16:13, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.