Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2015 October 30



File:Mineralization - occurrence and detection.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Mineralization - occurrence and detection.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The source page states that this file is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0, which is not the licence indicated on Wikipedia. Stefan2 (talk) 10:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SPRI set-up. Functioning principle – schematic view.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * File:SPRI set-up. Functioning principle – schematic view.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The source page states that this file is available under CC-BY-NC-SA 3.0, which is not the licence indicated on Wikipedia. Stefan2 (talk) 10:21, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Plightoffebruary17.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G5 by AnomieBOT ⚡  19:11, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Plightoffebruary17.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The watermark suggests that it comes from somewebsite. See c:COM:NETCOPYRIGHT. Stefan2 (talk) 10:35, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:JayarajVijaydirector.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * File:JayarajVijaydirector.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * User has a history of claiming own work where it isn't, under this account and under the previous one blocked for this reason -- . See Possibly_unfree_files/2015_October_29 where there's the claim that they took the photo when they were six years old because they are in the industry now. This is likely a clip from some interview shot (as there are other youtube video crops passing as own work photos). &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  14:08, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete It is obvious that we can't trust this uploader. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:36, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Rajeshbieee has a lengthy record of image copyright violations and of dishonesty over his ownership of them, so nothing he claims about ownership of images can be trusted. 823510731 (talk) 10:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ShineTomChackoactor.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * File:ShineTomChackoactor.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * User has a history of claiming own work where it isn't, under this account and under the previous one blocked for this reason -- . See Possibly_unfree_files/2015_October_29 where there's the claim that they took the photo when they were six years old because they are in the industry now. This is likely a selfie -- compare pose etc to this selfie from the subject's Facebook account and part of a series of similar photographs dated December 2014 (this particular image isn't there, but there's others that are very similar). &mdash; Spaceman  Spiff  16:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep the photograph as I only clicked it and it was on the promotional show of Vishwasam... Athallae Ellaam film on Kairali TV Channel for a program named Students Only and as I have earlier mentioned about my association with films and film artistes. I have already sent you an e-mail to reply, so that I can send you many photographs for your verification, but if you are not willing for the same, then what I will do. Moreover, you are bringing up a comparison on a previous account, maybe 6-7 years old and mentioning "same old story". For your information, I still have lot of photos taken for Vishwasam... Athallae Ellaam with Shankar, Shine Tom, Archana, Jayaraj Vijay etc... Now the "six year" old photographer debate, yes the file name is shanker1981 and that does not mean that the photograph was taken in 1981 and you are familiar with Oru Thalai Raagam Shankar and how he looks in 1981 this is shankar in 1981
 * Delete It is obvious from other discussions from 27, 28 and 29 October that we should not trust the uploader but assume that he is lying about everything and anything. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:40, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Uploader claims he took the photo on 04 August 2015, yet the copyright in the EXIF assigns copyright to someone else in 2011. Rajeshbieee has a lengthy record of image copyright violations and of dishonesty over his ownership of them, so nothing he claims about ownership of images can be trusted. 823510731 (talk) 10:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep This seems like a punishment to remove all the images I have uploaded, this one is my own photo and you you are claiming about " EXIF assigns copyright to someone else in 2011"...even I can see that description in the page. Please understand that I am a person working in film industry and have contacts with many film people and I have clicked many photographs of them.Rajeshbieee (talk) 14:38, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Timisoara.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete nominated revision. — ξ xplicit  07:25, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Timisoara.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Overwritten file: three in one.
 * 1) File uploaded by : Sourced and licensed. Keep this one.
 * 2) Files uploaded by : Although a source was provided in the upload log summaries, the uploader did not modify the file information page and didn't specify a licence in the upload log summaries. The files therefore have unknown licensing status. Stefan2 (talk) 20:29, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Kalabhavanshajonactor.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Kalabhavanshajonactor.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Copyright holder named in EXIF: "Copyright,Spreadtrum,2011" Stefan2 (talk) 20:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * This is one among many photographs where I clicked on the set of Malayalam film Njan Samvidhanam Cheyyum and I am ready to send anyone the original copy ( without cropped ) for verification. Rajeshbieee (talk) 03:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Uploader claims he took the photo on 06 July 2015 (a day when he seems to have photographed a large number of people), yet the copyright in the EXIF assigns copyright to someone else in 2011. Rajeshbieee has a lengthy record of image copyright violations and of dishonesty over his ownership of them, so nothing he claims about ownership of images can be trusted. 823510731 (talk) 10:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep This seems like a punishment to remove all the images I have uploaded, this one is my own photo and you you are claiming about EXIF assigns copyright to someone else in 2011"...even I can see that description in the page. Please understand that I am a person working in film industry and have contacts with many film people and I have clicked many photographs of them.Rajeshbieee (talk) 14:38, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:ActorKochuPreman.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * File:ActorKochuPreman.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Copyright holder named in EXIF: "Copyright,Spreadtrum,2011" Stefan2 (talk) 20:48, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * This is one among many photographs where I clicked on the set of Malayalam film Njan Samvidhanam Cheyyum and I am ready to send anyone the original copy ( without cropped ) for verification. Rajeshbieee (talk) 03:01, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Uploader claims he took the photo on 06 July 2015 (a day when he seems to have photographed a large number of people), yet the copyright in the EXIF assigns copyright to someone else in 2011. Rajeshbieee has a lengthy record of image copyright violations and of dishonesty over his ownership of them, so nothing he claims about ownership of images can be trusted. 823510731 (talk) 10:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep This seems like a punishment to remove all the images I have uploaded, this one is my own photo and you you are claiming about EXIF assigns copyright to someone else in 2011"...even I can see that description in the page. Please understand that I am a person working in film industry and have contacts with many film people and I have clicked many photographs of them.Rajeshbieee (talk) 14:39, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:RenjiPanickerdir.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * File:RenjiPanickerdir.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Copyright holder named in EXIF: "Copyright,Spreadtrum,2011" Stefan2 (talk) 20:49, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * This is one among many photographs where I clicked on the set of Malayalam film Njan Samvidhanam Cheyyum and I am ready to send anyone the original copy ( without cropped ) for verification. Rajeshbieee (talk) 03:02, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Uploader claims he took the photo on 06 July 2015 (a day when he seems to have photographed a large number of people), yet the copyright in the EXIF assigns copyright to someone else in 2011. Rajeshbieee has a lengthy record of image copyright violations and of dishonesty over his ownership of them, so nothing he claims about ownership of images can be trusted. 823510731 (talk) 10:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep This seems like a punishment to remove all the images I have uploaded, this one is my own photo and you you are claiming about 'EXIF assigns copyright to someone else in 2011"...even I can see that description in the page. Please understand that I am a person working in film industry and have contacts with many film people and I have clicked many photographs of them.Rajeshbieee (talk) 14:39, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * I don't understand your explanation for the EXIF copyright statement. If you took the photograph yourself and own the copyright, why would it say "Copyright,Spreadtrum,2011" in the EXIF data in the file itself? If you took the photo, you must know how that got there, yes? Also, as you have blatantly lied about your ownership of other images and have never even once admitted it when challenged (instead making up further lies), why should we believe a word you say now? 823510731 (talk) 14:44, 1 November 2015 (UTC)


 * It is the camera settings that is showing "Copyright,Spreadtrum,2011" and I believe for all the photos taken using that mobile camera, the settings will remain the same and I dont know how to explain further that I own that camera and I take the pictures and its copyright shows as "Copyright,Spreadtrum,2011" eventhough I purchased the camera (mobile phone ) only in December 2014 and I dont know how to prove you that I am right.Rajeshbieee (talk) 08:56, 3 November 2015 (UTC)


 * Please check these files uploaded File:Alpana on saraswati puja2.jpg and File:Khaste lake.jpeg uploaded by other editors and its copyright too showing "Copyright,Spreadtrum,2011". See this is a common issue and I believe may be for Samsung mobile phone/cameras. Rajeshbieee (talk) 13:09, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Above all, the wikipedia page itself says "https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spreadtrum#3G_smartphone_processors" the model number SC7727S using spreadtrum processors. I believe now you might have understood on the EXIf "Copyright,Spreadtrum,2011" issue. Most of my photos comes under this category and please check the next step. Rajeshbieee (talk) 16:13, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SureshKumarProducer.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * File:SureshKumarProducer.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Copyright holder named in EXIF: "Copyright,Spreadtrum,2011" Stefan2 (talk) 20:49, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * This is one among many photographs where I clicked on the set of Malayalam film Njan Samvidhanam Cheyyum and I am ready to send anyone the original copy ( without cropped ) for verification. Rajeshbieee (talk) 03:04, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Uploader claims he took the photo on 06 July 2015 (a day when he seems to have photographed a large number of people), yet the copyright in the EXIF assigns copyright to someone else in 2011. Rajeshbieee has a lengthy record of image copyright violations and of dishonesty over his ownership of them, so nothing he claims about ownership of images can be trusted. 823510731 (talk) 10:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep This seems like a punishment to remove all the images I have uploaded, this one is my own photo and you you are claiming about EXIF assigns copyright to someone else in 2011"...even I can see that description in the page. Please understand that I am a person working in film industry and have contacts with many film people and I have clicked many photographs of them.Rajeshbieee (talk) 14:40, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SasiKalingaactor.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * File:SasiKalingaactor.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Copyright holder named in EXIF: "Copyright,Spreadtrum,2011" Stefan2 (talk) 20:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * This is one among many photographs where I clicked on the set of Malayalam film Njan Samvidhanam Cheyyum and I am ready to send anyone the original copy ( without cropped ) for verification. Rajeshbieee (talk) 03:04, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Uploader claims he took the photo on 06 July 2015 (a day when he seems to have photographed a large number of people), yet the copyright in the EXIF assigns copyright to someone else in 2011. Rajeshbieee has a lengthy record of image copyright violations and of dishonesty over his ownership of them, so nothing he claims about ownership of images can be trusted. 823510731 (talk) 10:42, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep This seems like a punishment to remove all the images I have uploaded, this one is my own photo and you you are claiming about 'EXIF assigns copyright to someone else in 2011"...even I can see that description in the page. Please understand that I am a person working in film industry and have contacts with many film people and I have clicked many photographs of them.Rajeshbieee (talk) 14:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Sudheerkaramanaactor.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Sudheerkaramanaactor.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Copyright holder named in EXIF: "Copyright,Spreadtrum,2011" Stefan2 (talk) 20:51, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * This is one among many photographs where I clicked on the set of Malayalam film Njan Samvidhanam Cheyyum and I am ready to send anyone the original copy ( without cropped ) for verification. Rajeshbieee (talk) 03:05, 31 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. Uploader claims he took the photo on 06 July 2015 (a day when he seems to have photographed a large number of people), yet the copyright in the EXIF assigns copyright to someone else in 2011. Rajeshbieee has a lengthy record of image copyright violations and of dishonesty over his ownership of them, so nothing he claims about ownership of images can be trusted. 823510731 (talk) 10:41, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep This seems like a punishment to remove all the images I have uploaded, this one is my own photo and you you are claiming about 'EXIF assigns copyright to someone else in 2011"...even I can see that description in the page. Please understand that I am a person working in film industry and have contacts with many film people and I have clicked many photographs of them.Rajeshbieee (talk) 14:42, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * So explain why the EXIF copyright in the file itself says "Copyright,Spreadtrum,2011" - if you took the photo, you must know how it got there, yes? And I've read your claim to be "a person working in film industry and have contacts with many film people" many times, but I've seen no evidence to support it. 823510731 (talk) 14:46, 1 November 2015 (UTC)


 * What evidence you are looking for the same? This is the only evidence I can show you from web as I am one among the cast of the film. Cast. As an actor I have done some films and I hope the evidence will come out more stronger in coming months. Please wish me for a successful film career as an actor. Rajeshbieee (talk) 09:00, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:SakshiSharmaact.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * File:SakshiSharmaact.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Overwritten file: three in one. The middle uploader is a copyright violation. The uploader has a history of providing incorrect copyright information, both on file information pages and in PUF discussions, so we should assume that the other file uploads also are unfree. Stefan2 (talk) 20:55, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. At least one revision is a proven copyright violation (and the uploader claims he took two of the previous revisions himself on the same day, though they're clearly at different locations and with different clothing). The uploader, Rajeshbieee, has a lengthy record of image copyright violations and of dishonesty over his ownership of them, so nothing he claims about ownership of images can be trusted. 823510731 (talk) 10:39, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep photoshoot done on same day and same photo was used in film's website, yes on the same day, press meet too happened with different clothing and as an actor I also played a role in that film.Rajeshbieee (talk) 14:43, 1 November 2015 (UTC)
 * We can't require that you identify the film or the role you say you played in it, as that could constitute outing, but if you voluntarily chose to identify yourself then we could check your claims to be a film actor. What do you say? 823510731 (talk) 14:49, 1 November 2015 (UTC)


 * I am concentrating in film industry as an actor and you can see the trailer of one of my upcoming films where I do a major role.Trailer Suvarotti
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Devi Nampiaparampil (US Department of Veterans Affairs).jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  09:05, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * File:Devi Nampiaparampil (US Department of Veterans Affairs).jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Impossible to authenticate that this actually came from the Veterans Administration and frankly it doesn't look like a government photo, more like an actors' headshot. On Tineye it appears on several commercial websites and no government websites. Brianhe (talk) 21:52, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:STR.jpg
<div class="boilerplate puf vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete nominated revision. — ξ <sup style="color:#000000;">xplicit  07:25, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
 * File:STR.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Overwritten file. The revision by has unknown source and licence. Keep all other revisions of this file. Stefan2 (talk) 22:50, 30 October 2015 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.