Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2016 April 1



File:€2 Portugal 2011 - Pinto.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: keep Licensed under fair use, not eligible for deletion in this venue. — ξ xplicit  05:17, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * File:€2 Portugal 2011 - Pinto.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * reason this image is non-free Triplecaña (talk) 13:18, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This image is currently tagged as non-free. If there is a dispute with the rationale, please tag the image with dfu or list it at WP:FFD. AnomieBOT ⚡ 14:09, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * , non-free images are valid in English Wikipedia if they have rationales. ©   Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 00:17, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * See c:COM:EURO Triplecaña (talk) 00:31, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Two things. One, that link is to Commons. Commons and Wikipedia are completely separate and one does not have any sway over the other. So while that page does say that the coins cannot be free use, they can be under fair use which is what matters here on the English Wikipedia. Two, enwiki allows fair use and the rational and licensing on the file is fine. As such, there is nothing wrong with this file. --Majora (talk) 00:41, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Phoenix1.JPG

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: delete nominated file. The remaining files were never properly tagged for deletion, and can not be deleted as a result. Please tag all of them in future nominations. — ξ xplicit  05:17, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Phoenix1.JPG ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This looks like a photo of a sculpture judging by the description. Assuming that John Safer is the sculptor - a notion supported by the fact the article was created by the uploader - the work of art is still copyrighted and this image a derivative work. We'd need proof that it's freely licensed then. The uploader has a history of copyright issues and it seems other uploads have similar problems to this one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete, derivated work of a 3D object. I'd also include:
 * File:Nullspace2.JPG
 * File:Galaxy101.JPG
 * File:Single Scull.JPG
 * File:Wingsovertheworld.JPG
 * File:Twist101.JPG
 * File:Thewall101.JPG
 * File:Swing101.JPG
 * File:Sophisticatedlady.jpg
 * File:PiscesIII.jpg
 * File:PathwayII.JPG
 * File:Linkage1.JPG
 * File:Ladyoftheevening.JPG
 * File:Goldenhorn.JPG
 * File:Interplay31.jpg (looks like a derivated work)
 * File:Fantasy1.JPG
 * File:Cubeoncube1.JPG
 * File:Chess Set.JPG
 * File:Caring1.JPG
 * File:Beforethewind.JPG
 * File:BirdOfPeace.JPG
 * File:Ariel 1.JPG
 * File:Ode to Joy - 12a.JPG
 * File:John Inspects Soaring at tallix.JPG


 * Uploaded by another user
 * File:SaferChandelle.jpg
 * File:Quest-at Hopkins.jpg

The following are not covered by FoP, making them non-free. Having multiple of this, only one (if any) should be kept:
 * File:Judgment.jpg
 * File:Judgment1.JPG
 * File:Ascenta.JPG
 * File:Interplay III.JPG
 * File:Unity by John Safer 1987.jpg
 * File:Soaring101.JPG
 * File:Serve101.JPG
 * File:Search101.JPG
 * File:Promise1.JPG
 * File:Pathway101.JPG
 * File:Limits of infinity.JPG
 * File:Interplay4.JPG
 * File:Echoa.JPG
 * File:Challenge1.JPG
 * File:Bauhaus Remembered by John Safer 1974.jpg
 * File:Ascent2.JPG


 * Uploaded by another user
 * File:Quest-Foundry.jpg
 * File:Leading Edge.JPG (On Commons)

©  Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 00:17, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Forthoodmap.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:05, 9 April 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Forthoodmap.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Derivated work from this map. It is listed as BY-NC-SA at Flickr, but even if it was BY-SA in 2009, the map itself may be copyrighted. ©   Tb hotch ™ (en-2.5). 22:38, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:David Michael Barrett.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  07:03, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
 * File:David Michael Barrett.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * File source is given as IMDB (see http://www.imdb.com/name/nm3200015/) and says it was taken by the uploader. However, there is no EXIF data on the file. The metadata would normally be present if the file was uploaded directly from an image file taken off a camera or a phone. Lack of EXIF is more common when the file was downloaded from a site that strips it. I tried running a reverse Google image search and all I got was links back to IMDB. Self-work, and therefore CC0, is in question. Majora (talk) 23:48, 1 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.