Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2016 February 23



February 23

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Relisted all to Files for discussion/2016 April 30 Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 11:30, 30 April 2016 (UTC)

File:Larence Chamberlain and Thea Rasche 1928 circa.jpg

 * File:Larence Chamberlain and Thea Rasche 1928 circa.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The Leslie Jones collection is available as cc-nc-nd, which is incompatible with our licensing. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:23, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * keep PD not renewed per note there is no record for this photographer renewing his photos, so it applies across all his work, in the collection 198.24.30.111 (talk) 15:44, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I have not searched through that document, but note that PD-US-not renewed requires evidence of publication, which we currently do not seem to have. Also, if the pictures were created for a book, magazine or newspaper, then you also need to check if the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed. If the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed, then the photograph is typically covered by that renewal, and then you won't find the photographer's name in the Catalog of Copyright Entries. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:34, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Published in 1927. See, complete with view of the reverse, the 1927 caption and the stamp of Wide World Photos. (AFAIK, Commons users and the LoC haven't found subsisting copyrights for WWP photos from that era.) By the way, is the original photo by Jones? I doubt it. It was taken in Europe, right? The BPL image looks like a photographic reproduction of a photo. Jones may have made a reproduction and the BPL may have the negative of the reproduction, but the original would still be a WWP photo by an unidentified photographer. That could be the case also for other photos that have been collected in the collection but are not by Jones originally. This other image looks like an obvious example: . The photographer of the reproduction might have owned a copyright, if any, for taking a photo of the frame, but not on the original photograph. (It can be noted also that the BPL website dedicated to the Jones collection  has the subtitle "Boston Herald Traveler: 1917-1956", which suggests that the photos were published in that newspaper.)  -- Asclepias (talk) 15:23, 28 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Police Commissioner Sullivan and bishop at cardinal funeral.jpg

 * File:Police Commissioner Sullivan and bishop at cardinal funeral.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The Leslie Jones collection is available as cc-nc-nd, which is incompatible with our licensing. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * keep PD not renewed per, , , note there is no record for this photographer renewing his photos, so it applies across all his work, in the collection 198.24.30.111 (talk) 15:46, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I have not searched through that document, but note that PD-US-not renewed requires evidence of publication, which we currently do not seem to have. Also, if the pictures were created for a book, magazine or newspaper, then you also need to check if the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed. If the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed, then the photograph is typically covered by that renewal, and then you won't find the photographer's name in the Catalog of Copyright Entries. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:34, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Aviator Wilmer Stultz 1928.jpg

 * File:Aviator Wilmer Stultz 1928.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The Leslie Jones collection is available as cc-nc-nd, which is incompatible with our licensing. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * keep PD not renewed per note there is no record for this photographer renewing his photos, so it applies across all his work, in the collection 198.24.30.111 (talk) 15:48, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I have not searched through that document, but note that PD-US-not renewed requires evidence of publication, which we currently do not seem to have. Also, if the pictures were created for a book, magazine or newspaper, then you also need to check if the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed. If the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed, then the photograph is typically covered by that renewal, and then you won't find the photographer's name in the Catalog of Copyright Entries. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:34, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Guggenheim and Doolittle 1930 circa.jpg

 * File:Guggenheim and Doolittle 1930 circa.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The Leslie Jones collection is available as cc-nc-nd, which is incompatible with our licensing. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * keep PD not renewed per note there is no record for this photographer renewing his photos, so it applies across all his work, in the collection
 * I have not searched through that document, but note that PD-US-not renewed requires evidence of publication, which we currently do not seem to have. Also, if the pictures were created for a book, magazine or newspaper, then you also need to check if the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed. If the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed, then the photograph is typically covered by that renewal, and then you won't find the photographer's name in the Catalog of Copyright Entries. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:34, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Maurice Bellonte and Dieudonne Costes1930.jpg

 * File:Maurice Bellonte and Dieudonne Costes1930.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The Leslie Jones collection is available as cc-nc-nd, which is incompatible with our licensing. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * keep PD not renewed per note there is no record for this photographer renewing his photos, so it applies across all his work, in the collection  198.24.30.111 (talk) 15:50, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I have not searched through that document, but note that PD-US-not renewed requires evidence of publication, which we currently do not seem to have. Also, if the pictures were created for a book, magazine or newspaper, then you also need to check if the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed. If the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed, then the photograph is typically covered by that renewal, and then you won't find the photographer's name in the Catalog of Copyright Entries. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Leverett Saltonstall 1938.jpg

 * File:Leverett Saltonstall 1938.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The Leslie Jones collection is available as cc-nc-nd, which is incompatible with our licensing. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * keep PD not renewed per note there is no record for this photographer renewing his photos, so it applies across all his work, in the collection 198.24.30.111 (talk) 15:54, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I have not searched through that document, but note that PD-US-not renewed requires evidence of publication, which we currently do not seem to have. Also, if the pictures were created for a book, magazine or newspaper, then you also need to check if the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed. If the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed, then the photograph is typically covered by that renewal, and then you won't find the photographer's name in the Catalog of Copyright Entries. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Ernest K. Warburton with his 575HP pursuit plane at East Boston Airport.jpg

 * File:Ernest K. Warburton with his 575HP pursuit plane at East Boston Airport.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The Leslie Jones collection is available as cc-nc-nd, which is incompatible with our licensing. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * keep PD not renewed in 1958 per note there is no record for this photographer renewing his photos, so it applies across all his work, in the collection 198.24.30.111 (talk) 15:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I have not searched through that document, but note that PD-US-not renewed requires evidence of publication, which we currently do not seem to have. Also, if the pictures were created for a book, magazine or newspaper, then you also need to check if the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed. If the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed, then the photograph is typically covered by that renewal, and then you won't find the photographer's name in the Catalog of Copyright Entries. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Miss Harriet Quimby, Boston girl aviator who lost her life trying to entertain the public at Squantum.jpg

 * File:Miss Harriet Quimby, Boston girl aviator who lost her life trying to entertain the public at Squantum.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The Leslie Jones collection is available as cc-nc-nd, which is incompatible with our licensing. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * keep PD not renewed in 1939 per note there is no record for this photographer renewing his photos, so it applies across all his work, in the collection 198.24.30.111 (talk) 16:00, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I have not searched through that document, but note that PD-US-not renewed requires evidence of publication, which we currently do not seem to have. Also, if the pictures were created for a book, magazine or newspaper, then you also need to check if the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed. If the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed, then the photograph is typically covered by that renewal, and then you won't find the photographer's name in the Catalog of Copyright Entries. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Miss Helen Hicks, 18-year-old golf star, and Elinor Smith, 17-year-old aviatrix, at Fairchild Field, Farmingdale, N.Y.jpg

 * File:Miss Helen Hicks, 18-year-old golf star, and Elinor Smith, 17-year-old aviatrix, at Fairchild Field, Farmingdale, N.Y.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The Leslie Jones collection is available as cc-nc-nd, which is incompatible with our licensing. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * PD not renewed in 1956 per note there is no record for this photographer renewing his photos, so it applies across all his work, in the collection 198.24.30.111 (talk) 16:03, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I have not searched through that document, but note that PD-US-not renewed requires evidence of publication, which we currently do not seem to have. Also, if the pictures were created for a book, magazine or newspaper, then you also need to check if the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed. If the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed, then the photograph is typically covered by that renewal, and then you won't find the photographer's name in the Catalog of Copyright Entries. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Wiley Post and Harold Gatty in Boston East Boston Airport 1931.jpg

 * File:Wiley Post and Harold Gatty in Boston East Boston Airport 1931.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The Leslie Jones collection is available as cc-nc-nd, which is incompatible with our licensing. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * keep PD not renewed in 1959 per note there is no record for this photographer renewing his photos, so it applies across all his work, in the collection 198.24.30.111 (talk) 16:05, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I have not searched through that document, but note that PD-US-not renewed requires evidence of publication, which we currently do not seem to have. Also, if the pictures were created for a book, magazine or newspaper, then you also need to check if the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed. If the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed, then the photograph is typically covered by that renewal, and then you won't find the photographer's name in the Catalog of Copyright Entries. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Bonney Gull before it crashed &

 * File:Bonney Gull before it crashed & ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The Leslie Jones collection is available as cc-nc-nd, which is incompatible with our licensing. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:25, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * keep PD not renewed per note there is no record for this photographer renewing his photos, so it applies across all his work, in the collection 198.24.30.111 (talk) 15:43, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I have not searched through that document, but note that PD-US-not renewed requires evidence of publication, which we currently do not seem to have. Also, if the pictures were created for a book, magazine or newspaper, then you also need to check if the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed. If the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed, then the photograph is typically covered by that renewal, and then you won't find the photographer's name in the Catalog of Copyright Entries. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC)

File:Gov. Hurley throws out the first ball as Joe Cronin and McCarthy watch, at Fenway.jpg

 * File:Gov. Hurley throws out the first ball as Joe Cronin and McCarthy watch, at Fenway.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The Leslie Jones collection is available as cc-nc-nd, which is incompatible with our licensing. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 02:26, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * keep PD not renewed per or  or . 198.24.30.111 (talk) 15:18, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * I have not searched through that document, but note that PD-US-not renewed requires evidence of publication, which we currently do not seem to have. Also, if the pictures were created for a book, magazine or newspaper, then you also need to check if the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed. If the book, magazine or newspaper was renewed, then the photograph is typically covered by that renewal, and then you won't find the photographer's name in the Catalog of Copyright Entries. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:36, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * If this image was published, it was probably published in the Boston Herald-Traveler, for whom Jones worked, on April 24 or 25, 1937. (A similar picture by a Globe photographer appears in the Boston Globe edition for the 25th.)  Note also that File:Charles Francis Hurley 1937.png is a crop from this image.  Magic ♪piano 21:36, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Jackson Boulevard Subway.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Jackson Boulevard Subway.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Invalid license. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 04:49, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:KPOGCL Logo.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  03:03, 2 March 2016 (UTC)
 * File:KPOGCL Logo.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is a likely copyrightable company logo uploaded by what may be a representative of the company. If so, they need to follow the steps on WP:IOWN to clarify the copyright ownership, seeing as editors editing on behalf of companies do not necessarily have the authorization to license logos (also, I am not sure if CC licenses are a good license for logos) Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 12:39, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flushing street vendor under LIRR bridge.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Proof of permission has been provided, and we don't require anything more than that. Nyttend (talk) 01:38, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Flushing street vendor under LIRR bridge.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * From Flickr without evidence of permission from the Flickr user. Was tagged with OTRS pending and {{subst:npd}}, but the uploader removed the tags. Stefan2 (talk) 19:38, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * This is ridiculous. This is proof. I listed it as all rights reserved on Flickr simply because I do not want to change most of my licensing on flickr by default, also because while I want to pursue a dual licensing strategy where people on Wikipedia are free to use the image as they please (under a free license), while not jeopardizing my bread and butter through people who contact me to pay for licensing my images through Flickr. Stop trying to scare photographers away. Yanping Nora Soong (talk) 19:55, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * That link is no evidence whatsoever. WP:IOWN requires a statement on Flickr that the two accounts belong to the same person, whereas a statement on Wikipedia isn't worth anything. However, the diff link you provided contains a link to Flickr, where a statement is being made. That statement is sufficient but needs to be mentioned on the file information page so that people who are looking at the file information page can see that the accounts belong to the same person. A link on your userpage is likely to be overlooked. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:30, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Brooks Hall at the University of Virginia.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Proof of permission has been provided, and we don't require anything more than that. Nyttend (talk) 01:38, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Brooks Hall at the University of Virginia.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * From Flickr without evidence of permission from the Flickr user. Was tagged with OTRS pending and {{subst:npd}}, but the uploader removed the tags. Stefan2 (talk) 19:38, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * This is ridiculous. This is proof. I listed it as all rights reserved on Flickr simply because I do not want to change most of my licensing on flickr by default, also because while I want to pursue a dual licensing strategy where people on Wikipedia are free to use the image as they please (under a free license), while not jeopardizing my bread and butter through people who contact me to pay for licensing my images through Flickr. Stop trying to scare photographers away. Of course this image has permission. The account and my accounthave the same long fucking Asian name, and we look alike, and I am a graduate of UVa. Yanping Nora Soong (talk) 19:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * That link is no evidence whatsoever. WP:IOWN requires a statement on Flickr that the two accounts belong to the same person, whereas a statement on Wikipedia isn't worth anything. However, the diff link you provided contains a link to Flickr, where a statement is being made. That statement is sufficient but needs to be mentioned on the file information page so that people who are looking at the file information page can see that the accounts belong to the same person. A link on your userpage is likely to be overlooked. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:31, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Runners on the Williamsburg Bridge.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Proof of permission has been provided, and we don't require anything more than that. Nyttend (talk) 01:38, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Runners on the Williamsburg Bridge.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is listed as all rights reserved on Flickr. There is no evidence that the uploader and the Flickr user are the same person. Stefan2 (talk) 19:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * See above. Yanping Nora Soong (talk) 19:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:UVa student dissociating.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Proof of permission has been provided, and we don't require anything more than that. Nyttend (talk) 01:38, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:UVa student dissociating.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is listed as all rights reserved on Flickr. There is no evidence that the uploader and the Flickr user are the same person. Stefan2 (talk) 19:40, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Subway suicide aftermath, E train on 53rd.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Proof of permission has been provided, and we don't require anything more than that. Nyttend (talk) 01:38, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * <span class="plainlinks nourlexpansion lx" id="File:Subway suicide aftermath, E train on 53rd.jpg">File:Subway suicide aftermath, E train on 53rd.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is listed as all rights reserved on Flickr. There is no evidence that the uploader and the Flickr user are the same person. Stefan2 (talk) 19:41, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * See above. Yanping Nora Soong (talk) 19:56, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Union Square chess with spectators.jpg
<div class="boilerplate puf vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Proof of permission has been provided, and we don't require anything more than that. Nyttend (talk) 01:38, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Union Square chess with spectators.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is listed as all rights reserved on Flickr. There is no evidence that the uploader and the Flickr user are the same person. Stefan2 (talk) 19:41, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * See above. Yanping Nora Soong (talk) 19:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Flushing Main St, Kissena Blvd, and 41 Av crowded intersection.jpg
<div class="boilerplate puf vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Proof of permission has been provided, and we don't require anything more than that. Nyttend (talk) 01:38, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * <span class="plainlinks nourlexpansion lx" id="File:Flushing Main St, Kissena Blvd, and 41 Av crowded intersection.jpg">File:Flushing Main St, Kissena Blvd, and 41 Av crowded intersection.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * See c:Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flushing Main St, Kissena Blvd, and 41 Av crowded intersection.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 19:43, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * See above. Yanping Nora Soong (talk) 19:57, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:William Shatner frame capture.png
<div class="boilerplate puf vfd xfd-closed" style="background-color: #e5ecf5; margin: 1em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid Gray;">
 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Withdrawn by initiator - F ASTILY 06:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:William Shatner frame capture.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Seems to be a derivative of non-free content. See source: "Frame capture from video"  F ASTILY  22:24, 23 February 2016 (UTC)
 * It's my work, I shot the footage, I digitized the image and I provided the proper license when I uploaded the file. <span style="text-shadow:#F8F8FF 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em,#F4BBFF -0.2em -0.3em 0.6em,#BFFF00 0.8em 0.8em 0.6em; color:#A2006D;">Atsme 📞📧 01:28, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Great, thanks for clarifying - F ASTILY 06:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.