Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files/2016 January 25



File:2009-2014 Honda Ridgeline RTL with navigation interior.png

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted as G7 by AnomieBOT ⚡  22:18, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * File:2009-2014 Honda Ridgeline RTL with navigation interior.png ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Image is a composite. The uploader is claiming they have taken all images, however these appear to include product photos from the manufacturer.  Refer to the top image o0f the collage.  It from the same base image as other cabin photos for Ridgelines used at other web sites including web sites from Honda or Honda dealerships.  See   and  for two examples.  Although the images are not identical, the shots are all from the exact same angle, with the exact same shadows, and the exact same creases in the seat material, etc. Whpq (talk) 12:32, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Endurance.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Endurance.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * It says that this was "Created using two separately obtained images from the web" so the copyright status is unknown. Stefan2 (talk) 16:31, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Benedetto XIII.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Benedetto XIII.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * Claimed to be a copy of c:File:Stemma-Leone-XIII.jpg which was deleted as a copyright violation in 2008. Stefan2 (talk) 16:48, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Ronit.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by AnomieBOT ⚡  04:03, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Ronit.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The uploader lists the author as psg116, but the uploader is called Indofilm. Stefan2 (talk) 17:01, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:John Evans.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:John Evans.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * The uploader states that "Evans died in 1897, so the photo was published before 1923" but this is not a correct conclusion. Many pictures which were created before 1897 have never been published, and there is no evidence that this was published before 1923. Stefan2 (talk) 17:05, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

File:Prathiba.jpg

 * The following discussion is an archived inquiry of the possible unfree file below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the discussion was: Delete; deleted by A file with this name on Commons is now visible. AnomieBOT ⚡ 04:03, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * File:Prathiba.jpg ([ delete] | talk | [ history] | [ logs]).


 * This is a derivative work. It says "by samji for media" but it is unclear if samji is the photographer or the artist. Evidence of permission is needed from both the photographer and from the artist. Stefan2 (talk) 17:20, 25 January 2016 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.