Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 December 11

December 11
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 00:19, 19 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikipedia subpages pros and cons/Evaluation → Wikipedia talk:Do not use subpages
Cross-namespace redirects with no useful edit history (first one is entirely useless, second and third were moved long ago). --- RockMFR 23:15, 11 December 2006 (UTC) Delete all. -- Renesis (talk) 06:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete all three as unneeded cross-namespace redirects. Gavia immer (u|t|c)  15:50, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete CNR. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 18:43, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

The result of the debate was All have been deleted by User:J.smith and User:NawlinWiki. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 18:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

Annihilate Wikipedia → Criticism of Wikipedia
Unlikely to ever be linked. They all seem to have been created just for sake of creating "____ Wikipedia" articles. --- RockMFR 23:10, 11 December 2006 (UTC) Delete all. -- Renesis (talk) 06:41, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete all per nomination. Gavia immer (u|t|c)  15:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

9/11 conspiracy hoaxes → 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 00:17, 19 December 2006 (UTC) A while back, someone took a poll (which seemed in bad faith) to change 9/11 Conspiracy Theories to 9/11 Conspiracy Hoaxes. The first four or so votes were to support the change, so one of those supporters decided to make this redirect. Within the next few days though, the vote has amassed an overwhelming amount of Oppose votes, deciding that the term "9/11 conspiracy hoaxes" was too PoV. The final result of that poll was 6 to change and 22 against. So this redirect should be deleted as such. .V. 22:19, 11 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Agreed. Delete Danny Lilithborne 20:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete POV redirect. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 18:47, 16 December 2006 (UTC)

GXO Magzine → Graphic Exchange Magazine
The result of the debate was Kept & tagged R from misspelling. -- JLaTondre 00:16, 19 December 2006 (UTC) "Magzine" is not a word 24.69.69.251 20:46, 11 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * It's a common mispelling, though. Keep Danny Lilithborne 20:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak keep per Danny, and I'm getting some google hits. Don't forget redirects are cheap.  Dar-Ape 04:14, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

SPAM SPAM SPAM!!!!!! → Spam (electronic)
The result of the debate was speedy delete (CSD:G1). --Gh87 17:34, 16 December 2006 (UTC) Unhelpful redirect, no incoming links, unlikely to be used as a search term Renesis (talk) 17:48, 11 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete per nom. Khatru2 18:57, 11 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Danny Lilithborne 20:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Pid analyzers → HNU Systems
The result of the debate was Deleted (db-redirnone as result of AFD on target). -- JLaTondre 18:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC) Article being linked to seems non-notable, and who would search for that and be looking for the name of a corporation? Michaelbusch 05:49, 11 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Keep PID Analyzers seems to be an alternate name for HNU Systems, so it is a valid redirect. The contested notability of HNU is not a reason to delete the redirect just yet. If HNU gets deleted, delete the redirect. If it stays, keep the redirect.s Koweja 21:57, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

PID Analyzers → HNU Systems
The result of the debate was Deleted (db-redirnone as result of AFD on target). -- JLaTondre 18:09, 17 December 2006 (UTC) See above. Michaelbusch 05:50, 11 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Keep see above entry.Koweja 21:57, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Editing Talk:Analyzing the parabola → Talk:Analyzing the parabola
The result of the debate was Deleted (db-author). -- JLaTondre 01:11, 11 December 2006 (UTC) I, the creator of the redirect, created it in error. Natl1 00:39, 11 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'