Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 December 12

Wikipedia/Replies to Critics Talk → Wikipedia talk:Replies to common objections
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 01:47, 22 December 2006 (UTC) Cross-namespace redirect. History merge of some really old edits was just completed, so this is no longer needed. --- RockMFR 21:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete CNL & per nom. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 18:39, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Dar-Ape 04:46, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

The result of the debate was speedily keep all. --Gh87 23:24, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

The Devil's Hands are Idle Playthings (Futurama episode) → The Devil's Hands are Idle Playthings
Same thing for my requests below. --Gh87 21:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)
 * keep all, useful for consistency. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 16:18, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep all, harmless. Deleting these, especially following a fresh page move would break links in old revisions of other pages, and article links from other web sites, and so on. This could result in the unintentional creation of duplicate articles, which is bad for several reasons. — CharlotteWebb 21:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Spanish Fry (Futurama episode) → Spanish Fry
Same thing for my requests below. --Gh87 21:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Three Hundred Big Boys (Futurama episode) → Three Hundred Big Boys
Same thing for my requests below. --Gh87 21:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

Obsoletely Fabulous (Futurama episode) → Obsoletely Fabulous
Same thing for my request below. --Gh87 21:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC)

The Farnsworth Parabox (Futurama episode) → The Farnsworth Parabox
Unless there is a serious reason to keep this redirect page, nobody else is going to type this redirect title at all, and "The Farnsworth Parabox" was non-existant before a redirective move. --Gh87 21:01, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

Sucking poop → Coprophilia
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 01:48, 22 December 2006 (UTC) offensive, would never be used as a legit redirect MKoltnow 05:51, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete Just get rid of it. -Royalguard11 (Talk·Desk·Review Me!) 18:41, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Redirects make sense as a search aid for common slang terms. Is this common slang or something made up in school one day? --Dgies 18:07, 17 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment I suspect that this is more like the latter. The edit history of many of the dozen or so sockpuppets of Nintendude who are responsible for creating this redirect shows that he likes to edit articles about faeces. MKoltnow 18:47, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

Philip Jensen → Phillip Jensen
The result of the debate was Kept and tagged as. -- JLaTondre 01:49, 22 December 2006 (UTC) This is a spelling mistake. It would help to delete this redirect to identify any spelling mistakes in articles about Sydney Evangelicalism/Anglicanism. - Ta bu shi da yu 07:13, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Comment this is a plausible typo, which is a legitimate reason to have a redirect around here... Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 16:19, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep to make the creation of a duplicate article less likely, especially for such a common spelling error/variant as Philip/Phillip. See also Category:Redirects from misspellings. Special:Whatlinkshere makes a good spell-checking tool. — CharlotteWebb 21:30, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

There is → Existential quantification
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 01:51, 22 December 2006 (UTC) An unlikely search term for quantification CMummert 12:12, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete exceedingly unlikely search term. Dar-Ape 04:12, 18 December 2006 (UTC)

Click B (group) → Click-B
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 01:57, 22 December 2006 (UTC) I recently moved this article since there is no other use of the name. The redirect is an unlikely (and unnecessary) search term. PC78 22:09, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete per nom. --- RockMFR 18:34, 17 December 2006 (UTC)

A Wonderful Life (2005 film) → Wonderful Life (TV series)
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 01:59, 22 December 2006 (UTC) Article was moved since it was incorrectly named. The redirect is an unlikely search term. PC78 22:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Weak keep, what makes you think the same mistake won't be made twice? For example, if somebody has bookmarked the old title, where they remember the article existing, and now there's nothing... they are likely to say "why has this been deleted? well that was an obvious mistake..." and repost the content, creating a duplicate article without realizing it's been moved else where. Also, it was in fact released in 2005, and "TV movies" and/or mini-series are sometimes mistakenly referred to as "film". — CharlotteWebb 21:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

A Wonderful Life (2005) → Wonderful Life (TV series)
The result of the debate was Re-targeted to A Wonderful Life (musical). -- JLaTondre 02:01, 22 December 2006 (UTC) As above. PC78 22:23, 12 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Stronger keep, as the year by itself is not misleading at all. — CharlotteWebb 21:41, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment, actually it is since it could be confused with A Wonderful Life (musical), described on the disambiguation page as "a 2005 musical" (although the article itself isn't entirely clear on this). PC78 08:26, 14 December 2006 (UTC)