Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2006 December 24

Frank Tieri (organized crime) → Frank Tieri (mobster)
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 17:48, 31 December 2006 (UTC) The article, Frank Tieri, was recently made into a disambig page and the original article redirected to Frank Tieri (organized crime). However, according to consistancy and naming convention, the correct title should be Frank Tieri (mobster). MadMax 22:56, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete. It wouldn't be useful as a search term anyways and was just made two weeks ago. --- RockMFR 23:52, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Corneles Essex → Cornelius Essex
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 17:49, 31 December 2006 (UTC) The redirect, Corneles Essex, is a typo of the article Cornelius Essex which I recently created MadMax 22:56, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete. Creator requests deletion. Unlikely typo. --- RockMFR 23:53, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete, per CSD G7 (author request). Schutz 08:28, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

BushTalk → Talk:Bush
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 17:54, 31 December 2006 (UTC) I originally asked for speedy deletion under CSD R2, but the notice was removed because CamelCase redirects should be kept, so I am listing it here to see which rule should have precedence. To me, having "BushTalk" in the article namespace looks very confusing, and the benefit of removing it outweighs the potential compatibility with a link to another namespace. Schutz 17:26, 24 December 2006 (UTC)


 * Comment I'd be interested to see as well. This is the first I've run into a CamelCase redirect and from what the category page seems to say, it looks like it should be kept as is.  But, I'm not entirely sure.  Because of that ambiguity, that's why I removed the speedy deletion tag.  Metros232 17:44, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. The cross namespace CamelCase redirects do not need to be kept. There are only about twenty of them left - I'll probably get around to tagging all of them. --- RockMFR 18:20, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Let's wait until this RFD is closed, and I'll be happy to tag them afterwards if needed. Schutz 18:25, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete cross namespace-- it could come up when hitting Special:Random. Dar-Ape 20:42, 25 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment. Note that, as far as I know, Special:Random will never hit a redirect. Schutz 08:19, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete- WP:NOT Tonytypoon 05:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment Uhh...what? Metros232 05:13, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * The Talk:Bush looks like a forum, possibly generating people's comments in a short period of time. I believe Wikipedia is not a forum. Tonytypoon 05:31, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * ....you DO understand that Talk:Bush is a talk page for the article Bush, right? Metros232 05:33, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Looks like "talk about president Bush", since "Bush" is a surname. Tonytypoon 05:46, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Tony, look, it's a talk page to discuss the article. Just like there's Talk:Chin Wee Loon where you went to plead your case for us to not delete your article several times over.  That's what a talk page is, they're not meant to be forums, they're meant to be places to discuss the article as has happened at [{Talk:Bush]] where there's been discussions about the best way to redirect the page and disambiguate it.  Do you understand this?  It's not a forum or a social network, it's a hub to discuss the article.  Metros232 05:56, 29 December 2006 (UTC)

Oh noes → List of Internet slang phrases
The result of the debate was Deleted. The "noes" usage is not listed at suggested Wikitionary entry so soft-redirect not appropriate. -- JLaTondre 17:52, 31 December 2006 (UTC) CSD-R1. The phrase is not listed on the target page. It has been rv'ed due to insufficient citation, and appears not to be a specific "Internet" slang term. David Spalding ( ☎   ✉   ✍  ) 16:29, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Soft-redirect to Oh no. --- RockMFR 00:03, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Oh noes! → List of Internet slang phrases
The result of the debate was Deleted. The "noes" usage is not listed at suggested Wikitionary entry so soft-redirect not appropriate. -- JLaTondre 17:53, 31 December 2006 (UTC) CSD-R1. The phrase is not listed on the target page. It has been rv'ed due to insufficient citation, and appears not to be a specific "Internet" slang term. David Spalding ( ☎   ✉   ✍  ) 16:29, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Soft-redirect to Oh no. --- RockMFR 00:03, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Wikibomb → User:216.148.246.134
The result of the debate was Deleted by Proto. -- JLaTondre 16:59, 24 December 2006 (UTC) Same as below. I have also nominated the target page for deletion here. --- RockMFR 03:32, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Speedy-delete as the one below (I'd say per CSD R2, although R2 provides for redirects to User space from main space,but this one looks quite clear).

WP:BOMB → User:216.148.246.134
The result of the debate was Speedy delete (by Guinnog). Schutz 10:01, 24 December 2006 (UTC) WP shortcut to an IP User page, I don't really understand where this comes from. Schutz 01:32, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

Dong Fangzhou → Dong Fangzhuo
The result of the debate was Keep. Schutz 17:20, 31 December 2006 (UTC) A wrong spelling, can't speak it in Pinyin Matthew_hk   t  c  08:14, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Keep. It may surprise you to find we don't all speak Pinyin.  A perfectly reasonable redirect on a basic mis-spelling.  Proto ::  ►  15:15, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep I'm getting Google hits for both. Dar-Ape 20:45, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

Vote Hezbollah → Muslimgauze discography
The result of the debate was Keep. Schutz 17:24, 31 December 2006 (UTC) Unrelated to target article. Navou  talk  16:52, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Keep. Ctrl+f the term on the target page. It is the name of one of the albums. --- RockMFR 17:05, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * keep, this has been put up for RFD before. Vote Hezbollah is an album included in the discography. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 20:38, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Los Angeles Gators → Houston Texans
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 17:55, 31 December 2006 (UTC) "Los Angeles Gators" doesn't appear anywhere on Google except on a Wikipedia talk page last year and a Wikipedia deletion log. -- ArglebargleIV 21:13, 24 December 2006 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete. Hoax, nonsense. Has been deleted twice before. --- RockMFR 22:42, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. No link between redirect and target. Schutz 17:26, 31 December 2006 (UTC)