Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 April 29

Template:Kuro-RPG image → Template:Db-noncom
The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 04:57, 7 May 2007 (UTC) The template was only used in the images uploaded by [ Kevin W.], was originally redirected by Carnildo to permission and then was redirected to db-noncom by me since they were all uploaded after 2005-05-19. If this is the incorrect process, I apologise; close it, notify me and I will take it to TfD. Iamunknown 23:25, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. There don't seem to be transclusions (anymore), so deleting it here is fine. In either case, it's no longer needed (because there are no transclusions), and keeping it just means that someone might use it (that's bad). Therefore, it should be gone. Gavia immer (talk) 16:18, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

Hillary clintong → Hillary Rodham Clinton
The result of the debate was Speedy delete per [ CSD R3]. Iamunknown 02:11, 30 April 2007 (UTC) (this is a non-administrator closed discussion). Improbable misspelling, no incoming. --JianLi 04:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Strong delete - Searching that term in google lists some pages which contain offensive or obscene contents. huji— TALK 08:53, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per Huji.  bibliomaniac 1  5  00:35, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete as an attack page per WP:CSD. --Iamunknown 00:42, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per Huji. Tagged for speedy deletion per G10 and R3. -- Black Falcon (Talk) 02:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Microsoft fonts → Category:Microsoft typefaces
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 20:42, 6 May 2007 (UTC) See below Closedmouth 13:27, 29 April 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * 1) Support - Has the effect of an advertisementhuji— TALK 16:37, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. CNR. This redirect would be appropriate for a Typography of Microsoft article, but it doesn't yet exist. If its created during this discussion, then Redirect to that. Mtmelendez (Talk 13:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Microsoft typefaces → Category:Microsoft typefaces
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 20:42, 6 May 2007 (UTC) Cross namespace redirect Closedmouth 13:27, 29 April 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * 1) Support - Has the effect of an advertisementhuji— TALK 16:37, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. CNR. This redirect would be appropriate for a Typography of Microsoft article, but it doesn't yet exist. If its created during this discussion, then Redirect to that. Mtmelendez (Talk 13:51, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Overwhelm
The result of the debate was Deleted. Mgm says it better than I can. -- JLaTondre 20:41, 6 May 2007 (UTC) This page includes only a redirect to Wiktionary and such redirects do not actually work. --EncycloPetey 17:37, 29 April 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Convert to a "soft redirect." There's a way to do this. YechielMan 18:04, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Why? No pages link to this "article". --EncycloPetey 18:45, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - on EPetey's grounds. ALTON   .ıl  03:04, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, something like this will only encourage over-linking. :) --Xtifr tälk 03:24, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete - on EPetey's grounds. Possibly Disambig. - Mtmelendez (Talk 13:40, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. Empty pages already offer the option to search in Wiktionary. Empty pages have the added benefit of also offering to search in the Commons and giving a link to "why was my submission deleted?". All in all making an empty page more insightful than a non-working cross-project redirect or soft redirect. - Mgm|(talk) 10:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

MTorrent → UTorrent
The result of the debate was Resolved. Dr. WTF performed a copy-n-paste move from μTorrent to Utorrent (lowercase "t") and then messed up the redirects. I have reverted him as the copy-n-paste violates the GFDL. I left him a note on his talk page explaining this and directing him to WP:RM. -- JLaTondre 18:14, 29 April 2007 (UTC) Has anyone ever seen this before? MTorrent redirects to UTorrent, but UTorrent redirects back to MTorrent! They might both be pointed at μTorrent. Note that both redirects have page histories. YechielMan 18:03, 29 April 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'