Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 December 14

December 14
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion on December 14, 2007

Malou Hallström → Lasse Hallström
The result of the debate was keep since nom. appears to be using RfD to ask a question. John Reaves 08:57, 21 December 2007 (UTC) Malou Hallström just redirects to Lasse Hallström, her husband. If a person is not notable enough to have her own article, should she have a redirect to her husband? Fred-J 18:29, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * We don't preemptively create redirects for spouses but once created (especially if the redirect is the result of a merger), it's rarely worth the effort to delete them. On the plus side, the redirect does tend to inhibit the creation of an article on the non-notable spouse that would just get deleted.  (An awful lot of new users make the mistake of thinking that notability can be inherited.)  This one doesn't seem to be in the way of anything.  Unless there's a compelling reason to delete it, I'd recommend leaving it alone.  Rossami (talk) 21:22, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

Private beta → Web 2.0
The result of the debate was change.  Singu larity  04:12, 21 December 2007 (UTC) I thank that only the author of this redirect can put an equal signe between Private beta and Web 2.0; moreover the redirect is not used at all. Vlad|-> 14:50, 14 December 2007 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Change to #REDIRECT Software testing Edward (talk) 10:13, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Change to software testing as the appropriate target. –Pomte 23:53, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Change to #REDIRECT Software testing I agree that this is way better! --Vlad|-> 10:03, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

SdrawkcaB → Palindrome
The result of the debate was delete.  Singu larity  04:11, 21 December 2007 (UTC) .lla ta semordnilap a t'nis noitseuq ni drow eht dna ,egap emordnilaP eht no...

Er, I'm sorry, couldn't resist.

I have no idea why "sdrawkcaB" redirects to Palindrome, but it's a rather pointless (if amusing) redirect. There's no mention of "sdrawkcaB" on the Palindrome page, and the word in question isn't a palindrome at all. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 19:31, 14 December 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * A cute joke for about 5 seconds. Joke's over.  Time to delete.  Rossami (talk) 21:24, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete "backwards" is not a palindrome, neither is "sdrawrof" 132.205.99.122 (talk) 21:38, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete unrelated. –Pomte 23:53, 15 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. It would be ok if it was a palindrome. Since it is not.... Delete. Loukinho (talk) 00:06, 16 December 2007 (UTC)