Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 December 26

December 26
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion on December 26, 2007

Alleged autism epidemic → Epidemiology of autism
The result of the debate was keep. WjBscribe 02:26, 3 January 2008 (UTC) procedural nomination: This was found nominated for deletion via PROD with the statement "Inflammatory language in the title of the redirect." I tend to agree - this is an unfortunate, POV choice of title for the redirect and it should be deleted. User:Ceyockey ( talk to me ) 15:49, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Strong keep. This page (like almost all others related to autism) has been moved, merged and disputed for a long time.  This redirect preserves some of the history of those actions and helps subsequent editors sort out what happened and why.  Pagemoves are generally considered useful history.  I don't consider the title to be that much more inflammatory than other redirects that are routinely kept - certainly not enough to justify losing the history here.  Rossami (talk) 07:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Unfortunate keep. There is almost certainly no "autism epidemic", so "alleged" is appropriate.  It may also reflect some of the page-moving done with respect to this concept.  &mdash; Arthur Rubin |  (talk) 17:56, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Azia Kim → Stanford University
The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 02:28, 3 January 2008 (UTC) This is stupid. She was an individual that never attended the university and should not be affiliated with the university. See press for what actually happened. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.134.197.34 (talk) 11:59, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Mild delete. While I don't completely disagree with the rationale that when you delete a person's article for insufficient notability that you direct to the most relevant article, in this case, she is so tangential to the university's history that this doesn't work all that well, particularly since the article doesn't mention her.  --Nlu (talk) 16:33, 26 December 2007 (UTC)
 * This AFD discussion is relevant. Reading the discussion, I concur with the decision to delete the article and also concur that the connection is too tangential to even support the redirect.  Delete.  Rossami (talk) 07:46, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete non-defining association. –Pomte 03:15, 31 December 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. Abberley2 (talk) 14:53, 1 January 2008 (UTC)

York Region Road Construction Project → York Region Road Construction Project
The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 02:29, 3 January 2008 (UTC) Improper cross-namespace redirect. –Pomte 10:15, 26 December 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete as CNR. - Koweja (talk) 05:04, 31 December 2007 (UTC)