Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 February 20

Jacob Peters → Yakov Peters
The result of the debate was Kept. -- JLaTondre 22:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC) Possibly created by disgruntled User:Jacob Peters. While the article it points to might not be that person, should we have an article that shares the name of a user that seems to have a grudge agaist the site? BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, odometer) 12:41, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Keep. Actually it was created by User:Mikkalai, who is an admin, on August 13, 2005 (over 1 year before User:Jacob Peters's first edit). Until there is an article about a notable Jacob Peters it may as well stay as a redirect to Yakov Peters from an obvious Anglicisation. WjBscribe 12:46, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I originally had the inclination that User:Mikkalai was a JP account, but if we have a legit user creating JP in the mainspace, by all means. BuickCenturyDriver (Honk, odometer) 12:55, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete I see no relevance between the redirect and the actual article, not worth keeping. Telly   addict Editor review! 18:02, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Definite keep: "Jacob Peters" is a legitimate Anglicization of Yakov Peters, a notable Soviet secret policeman. It's highly likely that User:Jacob Peters took his username from the real-life Peters, given his admiration for Soviet methods, but we should keep the redirect as unrelated and pre-existing. See comments on WP:AI/N. MastCell 18:43, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep - Nomination made on false assumption of a connection between Yakov Peters and User:Jacob Peters. Similarity to a username is no reason to delete an otherwise useful spelling redirect. &mdash;Dgiest c 23:07, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per MastCell. The article even mentions the name. --- RockMFR 05:43, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep per RockMFR.  bibliomaniac 1  5  05:30, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Gyan → Jnana
The result of the debate was restored disambig. Someone replaced the disambig with a Sanskrit dict def. A follow-on editor redirected it without apparently looking at the article history. -- JLaTondre 12:50, 20 February 2007 (UTC) This used to redirect to Gyan Evans - a singer who goes by the name Gyan professionally. Jnana page does not explain why Gyan is set as a redirect for it Jarrod76 04:38, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Change to disambig as it used to be (see ). It should be noted that contrary to the nom, the page has never been a redirect to the Gyan Evans article. WjBscribe 11:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC)

de T → de Tomaso, et al
The result of the debate was Kept. While these are not used as links, the terms are still used as abbreviations in tables on articles (ex. Roberto Lippi). It is conceivable someone would use the abbreviation based upon seeing it in an article. -- JLaTondre 02:15, 3 March 2007 (UTC) Also: Ligi → Ligier, Pors → Porsche, Simc → Simca-Gordini, Talb → Talbot and Vanw → Vanwall

Redirects from abbreviations of Formula One constructors as displayed in old-format results tables. No longer required - all such references have been replaced with direct links to full constructor name. DH85868993 14:04, 20 February 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Keep against the probability that one or more of the pages using the old formats will be reverted to a prior version. Maintaining the redirects will prevent the reverted pages from suddenly having a list of unhelpful redlinks.  Rossami (talk) 04:46, 22 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: Upon further investigation, I doubt these redirects were ever used. Even the initial versions of the Formula One driver pages (created in December 2004) appear to have linked to the full constructor name. DH85868993 14:30, 24 February 2007 (UTC)