Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 February 22

Wiki vandalism → Vandalism
The result of the debate was Deleted. It has only been recreated twice, which isn't that much. If it continues to be recreated, I'll add it to protected titles. -- JLaTondre 23:09, 2 March 2007 (UTC) Crossnamespace blah blah. No brainer. JuJube 06:25, 22 February 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete. No need for this cnr. There are lots of incoming links, but almost all of these are from warnings on talk pages due to users vandalizing wiki vandalism, rather than actually using the link in the context of describing vandalism. --- RockMFR 05:25, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
 * It was originally an unsourced (and probably unsourcable) article which was deleted per an AFD discussion. (It was also a terrible vandal magnet.)  It appears to have been recreated several times and was finally created as a redirect in order to stop the repostings of the deleted article.  Looking at the deleted page history, it appears to have been successful at that.  Keep as a redirect because the redirect is less intrusive than the deletedpage template that we would have to replace it with.  Rossami (talk) 21:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * would not be necessary. See Protected titles. --- RockMFR 21:26, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
 * I'd never seen the new "protected title" code. My goodness, that's a complicated and expensive way to solve the problem.  Still, it could work.  Rossami (talk) 05:24, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, no need for delpage or a redirect.  &gt; R a d i a n t &lt;  11:34, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete and protect the title – Qxz 08:20, 28 February 2007 (UTC)