Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 July 21

List of largest settlements in England by population → List of largest urban sub-divisions in England by population
The result of the debate was speedy close - RfD is not the place to resolve editorial disputes. Discussion on the relevant talkpages (and potentially the dispute resolution process) is needed in this case. WjBscribe 00:48, 22 July 2007 (UTC) The page List of largest settlements in England by population was redirected to List of largest urban sub-divisions in England by population. This is inaccurate as, per the source document for the population figures, a settlement has a maximum population of 1,500. For this reason the title was misleading. EarlyBird 20:09, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * This page is subject to an ongoing content dispute and unilateral action by the nominating editor. The matter has been raised on WP:AN/I where further information is available. Until the matter is resolved, I suggest this request be speedily removed if that is possible.  DDStretch    (talk)  21:15, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

A redirect is not appropriate and User:EarlyBird is simply trying to twist facts and push a POV agenda to promote Manchester. His actions are not appropriate and show no consideration for other users of Wikipedia79.73.183.95 23:30, 21 July 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

User talk:90.240.240.173 → User talk:Mark bickley
The result of the debate was speedy close, Redirect was undone by creator. GrooveDog (talk) 18:31, 22 July 2007 (UTC) Registered User:Mark bickley redirecting the talk page of the dynamic IP he currently happens to be using to his own talk page. --Kurt Shaped Box 23:48, 21 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Hey sorry Kurt Shaped Box, I created the redirect because I kept forgetting to log in before editing and I dont check the talk page of my IP, so had anyone wanted to discuss any edits I made with my IP rather than my account, then they could add it on my account talk page and I would notice it. user talk:Mark bickley 18:15 22nd July '07
 * Though I wonder if it is allowed for Mark bickley to remove the RfD notice that was already in place, I think his voluntary undoing of the redirect cures this problem, so I suggest that the discussion be speedy closed as moot. EdJohnston 17:31, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'