Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 July 29

James Beattie (crap footballer) → James Beattie (footballer)
The result of the debate was speedy deleted, attack page (G10). Sr13 19:03, 29 July 2007 (UTC) Article was moved to the redirect by Transfer as a form of vandalism Kingjamie 15:52, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of football (soccer) related deletions. Kingjamie 15:56, 29 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete per criterion G10 (attack page). I have tagged it as such. — Gavia immer (talk) 17:20, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

Gaetano → Saint Cajetan
The result of the debate was disambig. -- JLaTondre 13:52, 4 August 2007 (UTC) Several other Gaetanos of note, including Gaetano Donizetti and Gaetano Mosca; the redirect could be replaced with a disambig page. Shouriki 00:49, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

Rebate (disambig) → Market dominance
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 13:48, 4 August 2007 (UTC) This is a misnamed DAB page, with a redirect to a page with it seems to have no connection! Nominated for deletion because most (if not all) people will go to the correct DAB page name. 202.63.40.179 04:39, 29 July 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete Firstly, the correct title should be "Rebate (disambiguation)". Second, this disambig page already exists at Rebate. there is therefore no reason to keep this redirect, although I must note certain things; your said most people would go to the right page, but that means not all!!! This redirect is therefore useful. Also what is the correct DAB page name??? Taking all these things into account, I propose that we delete this page and add a link at Rebate to the right DAB page name -- ChrisDHDR  &#xE503; • @ 17:43, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Weak keep and retarget to Rebate, which is where Rebate (disambiguation) points. Failing that, I'd suggest deletion.  Big Nate 37 (T) 17:47, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Changed to neutral. While rebate is still the best target in my opinion, I'm withdrawing my support for keeping a redirect ending in (disambig).  Big Nate 37 (T) 04:34, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete: I see absolutely no benefit in the non-standard "(disambig)", and we have both Rebate and Rebate (disambiguation), so I see this as little more than an incitement to create other similarly misnamed pages. We've deleted several other "(disambig)" redirs recently for similar reasons, This is a relic left over from before we standardized disambiguation pages, and no longer offers any benefits whatsoever.  The history is all at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Market_challenger&redirect=no, so there's no GDFL issues to worry about either.  Xtifr tälk 12:25, 31 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Rebate. Atropos 21:54, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

The Sims Technology → List of The Sims games
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 13:45, 4 August 2007 (UTC) "List of The Sims games" was moved by User:EastHighWildcats101 (here) to "The Sims Technology" without a reason. I undid the move, as "The Sims Technology" does not describe that the article is simply a list of The Sims-related games. "The Sims Technology" phrase is not truly used in real life. -- theSpectator talk 23:46, 29 July 2007 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * I would say speedy as CSD G3 (...redirects created during cleanup of page move vandalism), but one can hardly call this vandalism taking it in isolation. I don't see it being controversial though, and I think G6 (housekeeping) and R3 (implausible, recently created redirects) would apply here. This isn't a likely search term at all, and there aren't any incoming links now that I've reverted Seedbot's "fixes" for what were temporarily double redirects through List of The Sims games.  Big Nate 37 (T) 14:38, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Clearly explained by BigNate -- ChrisDHDR  &#xE503; • @ 17:50, 30 July 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete per above.  J- stan  Talk 15:27, 31 July 2007 (UTC)