Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 March 18

WP:UNSIGNED → Template:Unsigned
The result of the debate was Re-targeted to Signatures. -- JLaTondre 01:27, 28 March 2007 (UTC) It's a cross namespace redirect; it doesn't save anyone any typing; it was created by someone who couldn't remember where the original template is (Unsigned); it's not used. -- BlastOButter42 See  Hear  Speak  09:19, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete because it's not really a shortcut. mattbr 13:42, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete CN rdr, confusing, and un-needed. Alex43223T 03:57, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. It's not likely to be typed when looking for the target. --Rbraunwa 21:33, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Wikipedia:Signatures as a plausible search for the "Dealing with unsigned comments" section of this guideline. -- Scientizzle 15:27, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Signatures per Scientizzle.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 16:32, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Signatures per Scientizzle. -- Black Falcon 00:59, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Sexual repression → Religion and sexuality
The result of the debate was Deleted. -- JLaTondre 01:28, 28 March 2007 (UTC) This article appears not to have had any original content but to consist solely of redirects, which were disputed. Several redirects were attempted over its history, e.g. to Sex, Sexual intercourse, Sexuality and morality, then Religion and sexuality, but each was regarded as reflecting a POV view of the target topic and not effectively covering the topic of sexual repression as a subject within psychology. Accordingly, given that the topic itself is notable but it is better to say nothing than to say something incorrect about it, it is proposed to delete the article, without prejudice, until such time as someone can develop appropriate content on this psychology/psychoanalytic theory topic. --Shirahadasha 08:15, 18 March 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete. I wondered about retargetting it to Sexual abstinence, which is better than the previous targets. But abstinence is not necessarily an act of repression, nor does it necessarily result from it. Unless someone else comes up with a NPOV target, I agree with the nom. WjBscribe 13:49, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete A rather clear violation of WP:NPOV. JuJube 00:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete Agreed, violates NPOV. Alex43223T 03:57, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment, not sure if this would be NPOV enough, but what about a redirect to Reparative therapy? ^ demon [omg plz] 01:57, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Not happy with that one given that it only pertains to repressing same-sex sexual desires, which is not necessarily what the user searching for this term is looking for. Also, it seems to make a negative comment about reparative therapy, which Wikipedia shouldn't be making- however distasteful one might find the concept... sigh. WjBscribe 02:11, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Didn't think so. I knew it wasn't perfect, but I thought I'd just suggest it. ^ demon [omg plz] 02:33, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

VFU → Deletion review
The result of the debate was delete. John Reaves (talk) 02:32, 19 March 2007 (UTC) XNR dating from when Deletion Review was called Votes for Undeletion. Given the change in title this redirect now serves little purpose (WP:VFU exists as a redirect to the same page) and should be deleted. There do not appear to be any encyclopedic topics using this abbreviation. WjBscribe 01:54, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete as unused crossnamespace redirect. --Sigma 7 13:59, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'