Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2007 October 4

Votes for banning → Community sanction noticeboard
The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 17:32, 12 October 2007 (UTC) See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:Votes for banning. Grace notes T § 15:10, 6 October 2007 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

Fucking → Fuck
The result of the debate was retarget to Fuck (disambiguation). WjBscribe 17:35, 12 October 2007 (UTC) I'm fucking sick of this redirect being changed every time. I'm usually polite on Wikpedia, I used the f word because we are discussing a redirect related to that. This redirect changes every damn month, onl because there can't be an agreement on where this should redirect to. So we need a vote, when the discussion is over I will put a hidden message directing to this discussion. TheBlazikenMaster 13:16, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Next time, please remember to tag the redirect with the rfd template, it helps in the discussion. Thanks. - Mtmelendez (Talk 13:49, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, I usually do that, however I was in a hurry when I nominated this that I forgot. TheBlazikenMaster 17:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * My vote is fuck, since it's often used on YouTube and in countless movies. TheBlazikenMaster 13:16, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep as redirect to fuck. It's undeniably the most common use in all English-speaking countries, which refers to the offensive term of sexual intercourse. I'd also prefer a dablink in the fuck article stating: Fucking redirects here, for the Austrian village, see Fucking, Austria. For now, there's only one alternative term to the current redirect, which is the village. There's no need to disambiguate fucking. (Damn it, now I feel like a South Park episode :) - Mtmelendez (Talk 13:49, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I agree with the "fucking redirects here" part, there are two uses, I think the headnote should also state the literal meaning, as fucking someone often means to have sex with someone. TheBlazikenMaster 17:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep with dablink suggested by Mtmelendez. -- Craigtalbert 17:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Disambiguate between sexual intercourse, fuck, and Fucking, Austria. -- Reaper  X  20:30, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I actually am against that, since it would be a duplication of fuck (disambiguation), but redirect to a section there called fucking would be nice though. TheBlazikenMaster 20:56, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Touché, never thought of that. Redirect to fuck (disambiguation). -- Reaper  X  02:56, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * In Fuck (disambiguation) I have added new major section titles splitting the alternatives into forms derived from the English verb "to fuck" and forms (e.g. the Austrian village) with other origins. Anthony Appleyard 22:33, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * I def. think it is fine as being left at fuck. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Flatulated (talk • contribs) 23:21, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to fuck and then add a hatnote: .  Melsaran  (talk) 13:13, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to fuck. Generically, ir is just an adjective. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Reginmund (talk • contribs) 00:43, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to fuck (disambiguation). This has been discussed before. We need to link 'fuck', sexual intercourse, and the Austrian village. The dab page already does this. The way, the truth, and the light 03:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Well, maybe it has, but it was never discussed as Redirect for Deletion, why do you think I'm nominating it? So the redirect fucking would stop changing. Like I said, once finished I will add a hidden note. TheBlazikenMaster 15:33, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
 * This discussion would seem to have something to say. I'm not attacking you for nominating this. The way, the truth, and the light 00:24, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * That was a discussion of an unneeded disambiguation page, it had nothing to do with this redirect. TheBlazikenMaster 17:47, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to fuck (disambiguation). Which is a nice disambig article. I'm not sure how big the Austrian village is - it seems really small- but if it's big enough to be her at all, it "deserves" to be found at least as a link on the first page you get to if you write in it's name. And with this redirect, it will. Greswik 02:17, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to fuck (disambiguation), per The way, the truth and the light above. Seems the sanest and least controversial suggestion. Terraxos 18:44, 10 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Redirect to fuck (disambiguation). That makes the most sense. Rocket000 19:39, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Anna_Maria_Mannerheim → Mannerheim_(family)
The result of the debate was retarget to Adolf Erik Nordenskiöld. WjBscribe 15:09, 11 October 2007 (UTC) Unnecessary redirect. There's a link from the family page to the redirect page which creates a loop. Mytomi 10:46, 4 October 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Well then we should not delete but either (1) break the loop by removing the link in Mannerheim_(family) or (2) redirect to her husband Gustaf Nordenskiöld Adolf Erik Nordenskiöld (and remove the wikilink to Anna_Maria_Mannerheim there). I'd say (1). --Tikiwont 13:21, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Retarget to her husband's page unless there is evidence that she is independently notable. (And remove the circular redirects.)  The spousal relationship is more relevant than an apparently distant family relationship.  Rossami (talk) 22:10, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

SPIDS → Aaron Edwards
The result of the debate was delete. WjBscribe 15:05, 11 October 2007 (UTC) Was created by a vandal. Seems to have no sourceable relevance to Aaron Edwards Remy B 14:19, 4 October 2007 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete. I was the one who redirected it, and I only did it so the account who was editing the page would focus on the actual article on the subject. He wasn't obviously a vandal at the time. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 15:02, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment. Sorry for the accusation, it was a bit hasty of me to assume the vandal also made the redirect. Remy B 10:29, 5 October 2007 (UTC)
 * Not a problem, no offense taken. -Hit bull, win steak(Moo!) 14:17, 5 October 2007 (UTC)