Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 December 30

December 30
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on December 30, 2008

Poo juice → Poop
The result of the discussion was Delete.Tikiwont (talk) 10:39, 8 January 2009 (UTC) Created by a long term user so giving the benefit of the doubt as to the reason for its creation (and it's been up for almost two years) but there comes a limit… I see no possible use for this one as either a search term or link target. –  iride scent  17:31, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * I tried to determine, from that user's contribution list, the context under which he/she created that redirect, but I came up emptyhanded. There is no deletion log for that title, and it was that user's only contribution of the day, in a period of otherwise extensive activity. Probably heard that term on the street or something like that. But since the purpose and relevance of the redirect is still not clear, I say Delete. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 17:44, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * In an unrelated matter, it would be good to browse the "what links here" pages for articles on insults. You could find edits like this which previously went undetected. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 17:52, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Funnily enough, the thought had occurred to me… I really don't hope you think I was looking up redirects to Bitch, Poop and Shit just for the fun of it! –  iride scent  17:54, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as an unlikely search term and an equally unlikely target.  RichardΩ612  Ɣ ɸ 12:04, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Ass to ass → Requiem for a Dream
The result of the discussion was Delete.Tikiwont (talk) 10:41, 8 January 2009 (UTC) Term does not appear in article since a discussion about a particular scene of the film was removed (eight to nine months ago); scene in question is not referred to by this name (or variant) in any reliable source; phrase has much more prominent usage in other areas, according to Google search. B.Wind (talk) 17:23, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete. Even when that was part of the article, the amount of coverage was not nearly enough to justify a redirect. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 22:48, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Redirect to Anal sex seems a lot more natural. Headbomb {{{sup|ταλκ}}κοντριβς – WP Physics} 12:23, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Shitstain → Shit
The result of the discussion was speedy deleted by User:David Eppstein (CSD G3).

Nobody is ever going to search on this; nobody links to it and I can't imagine anyone ever will. –  iride scent  16:54, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Speedy delete. The creator's only other contributions are vandalism that got past vandal patrol yet still got reverted in no time. The merger with shit, which took place in February 2006, has been removed since. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 17:27, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete Creator's only contribs were vandalism. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 22:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

Eliteone → Bitch
The result of the discussion was Delete. --Allen3 talk 22:58, 7 January 2009 (UTC) Totally baffling. If this hadn't been up for two years without anyone raising an objection, I'd have R3'd it without blinking. Is there any good reason for this redirect to exist that has somehow passed me by? –  iride scent  16:48, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Speedy delete. In addition to being implausible as a search item, it was its creator's only contribution ever in Wikipedia. --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 17:16, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per above. ✼ American Eagle  ( talk ) 01:15, 4 January 2009 (UTC)

Ἐνέργεια (disambiguation) → Energy (disambiguation)
The result of the discussion was Delete. --Allen3 talk 22:56, 7 January 2009 (UTC) 

VERY obscure reference, especially in English Wikipedia. Not to mention that Ἐνέργεια by itself already has its own redirect. Mikaey (talk) 14:58, 30 December 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete. Ἐνέργεια may be the root of the word energy, but the actual meaning is quite a bit different. As already stated, Ἐνέργεια already points to energeia (and it could just as easily have pointed to Aristotle if the term were mentioned in that article). Not only is disambiguation unnecessary, there is none here, and this redirect is harmful as it can be confusing. B.Wind (talk) 15:25, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * keep, Energy (disambiguation) also covers energeia. If you disagree, create Energeia (disambiguation) and have Ἐνέργεια (disambiguation) point there. I find that more often than not the time invested in creating a deletion discussion would have been sufficient to resolve the problem. --dab (𒁳) 17:00, 30 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Except that suggestion would create a second unnecessary redirect as it, like the nominated one, is not disambiguating anything. Of course, the editor who created the redirect in question in the first place would have taken even less time than suggested above by tagging it with for speedy deletion, and that would have eliminated all problems caused by the redirect's creation. B.Wind (talk) 17:31, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete. I can't see the need of a redirect where the two words that make up the redirect title are not even in the same alphabet. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:58, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete the hatnote already indicates where you should go, nothing links to this redirect, and it's not ASCII, so is highly unlikely to be typed out (Greek + latin "disambiguation"?) 76.66.198.171 (talk) 14:04, 1 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete unlikely search target. Tavix (talk) 23:38, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete not needed: clue 1: no page with "(disambiguation)" in the title should be a redirect; clue 2: we should not have untranslated article titles for common nouns like: Ἐνέργεια redirects to Energeia - or we'll have endless non-English redirects for everything. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 20:05, 5 January 2009 (UTC)

Sarai Howard → Sarai
The result of the discussion was Retargeted to Sarai (rapper) --  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 03:35, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Rather pointless redirect to a disambiguation page, none of whose entries seem to be relevant.  Blanchardb - Me•MyEars•MyMouth - timed 03:28, 30 December 2008 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

Table Mountain (Mount Brewer) → Table Mountain (Tulare County, California)
 The result of the discussion was speedily deleted by User:Jimfbleak CSD G6, non-admin close B.Wind (talk) 06:10, 6 January 2009 (UTC) db-g6 Page was made a redirect when the article was move to Table Mountain (Tulare County, California). It can no longer be usefull,--DRoll (talk) 01:06, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Table Mountain (Tulare County, California) and Mount Brewer are not the same. This redirect makes no sence. I think at one time there was confusion among editors at to weither they were the same or not. I reality there is no such confusion. DRoll (talk) 02:35, 31 December 2008 (UTC) {'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'