Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 February 28

February 28
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion on February 28, 2008

Anthony da Silva (French) → Tony (footballer)
The result of the debate was delete. John Reaves 08:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC) Yet another implausible search term. – PeeJay 17:14, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. – PeeJay 18:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Anthony Tony → Tony (footballer)
The result of the debate was delete. John Reaves 08:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC) An implausible search term, in my opinion. – PeeJay 17:12, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football related deletions. – PeeJay 18:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Philippine Claim over the Spratly IslandsPolicies, activities and history of the Philippines in the Spratly Islands → Policies, activities and history of the Philippines in the Spratly Islands
The result of the debate was Deleted by Orangemike. -- JLaTondre (talk) 19:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC) I accidentally moved the page once and moved it again. The former automatically became a redirect. I'm the author of the article. Estarapapax Estarapapax! 10:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Speedy delete as both an author request (CSD G7) and a recently created implausible typo (CSD R3). I have tagged it. — Gavia immer (talk) 16:29, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia® → Wikipedia
The result of the debate was delete. John Reaves 08:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC) Implausible redirect Spartaz Humbug! 08:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete, agreed. Powers T 18:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Redirects are cheap. This one has been there for two years, has bothered no one, and may have helped some. Nominating the redirect just now, because I have mentioned it in a similar deletion review, is slightly uncalled for in my humble opinion. --Edcolins (talk) 19:52, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with the nominator. seresin | wasn't he just...? 00:05, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - I also agree with the nom.  Lara  ❤  Love  06:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 04:14, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Manual of Style (trademarks) which states these symbols are to be avoided. -- JLaTondre (talk) 02:17, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Kevlar® → Kevlar
The result of the debate was delete. John Reaves 08:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC) Implausible search term. Spartaz Humbug! 08:05, 28 February 2008 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete, agreed. Powers T 18:51, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. Besides what I wrote re Wikipedia®, the history of this redirect indicates that the article Kevlar was created in 2004 with the title Kevlar®. This indicates that someone searched for Kevlar®, before creating it. Not implausible search term thus, like any other redirects ending with "®". --Edcolins (talk) 19:58, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
 * I agree with the nominator. seresin | wasn't he just...? 00:05, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - I also agree with the nom.  Lara  ❤  Love  06:32, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete agreed with nom. Lord Sesshomaru (talk • edits) 04:50, 2 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete per Manual of Style (trademarks) which states these symbols are to be avoided. -- JLaTondre (talk) 02:17, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep The fact that the original article had a registered trademark means that older users may still try to find it there. It justifies this break from Wikiprotocol in this instance.--Encyclopedia Mike (talk) 03:05, 7 March 2008 (UTC)