Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2008 November 30

November 30
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on November 30, 2008

Bood values → Featured picture candidates/Blood values
The result of the debate was Retarget to Reference ranges for blood tests. Lenticel ( talk ) 05:27, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Highly unlikely CNR to a project page.  MBisanz  talk 09:58, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * It was just a stupid spelling error, remaining after a compensating article move. Jolly well delete it. Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:30, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Still, though, it sounds kind of funny. Yet, I don't think that reason is good enough to keep it. Mikael Häggström (talk) 16:31, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Retarget to Reference ranges for blood tests, which is where Blood values points and where the image referenced is used. --UsaSatsui (talk) 13:52, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Retarget as per UsaSatsui. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 20:16, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Retarget as UsaSatsui said. - Richard Cavell (talk) 10:23, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Retarget per above. Stifle (talk) 12:22, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - "Bood" is not a plausible misspelling of "blood". Otto4711 (talk) 23:12, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia status → Editor activity indicator
The result of the debate was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 15:07, 7 December 2008 (UTC)

Improper CNR to a wiki-process, does not link to content.  MBisanz  talk 09:57, 30 November 2008 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete, XNR. Stifle (talk) 12:22, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia Cookbook → Cookbook
The result of the debate was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 07:14, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Improper CNR to a defunct project, does not link to content.  MBisanz  talk 09:56, 30 November 2008 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Soft Redirect to Wikimedia Cookbook. It seems pretty obvious that someone searching for this term is looking for that target.  --UsaSatsui (talk) 13:54, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete, XNR. Stifle (talk) 12:22, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * Stubify if notable. A soft redirect makes sense but is a self-reference, not intended for mainspace.  -- Thin  boy  00  @106, i.e. 01:32, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

BIDRAFT1 → BITERM guideline proposal draft 1 (sandbox working version)
The result of the debate was Delete. Ruslik (talk) 14:59, 8 December 2008 (UTC)

Improper CNR to a project draft, does not link to content.  MBisanz  talk 09:55, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * OK - it only a redirect page. I'll comment there. --Matt Lewis (talk) 15:03, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * If this use of redirect is against policy, what do you suggest? I'll do what is suggested. The WP:BITASK taskforce itself is important, and is only on hold pending discussion at WP:IDTF. --Matt Lewis (talk) 15:06, 30 November 2008 (UTC)


 * Well the redirect WP:BIDRAFT1 would probably be the best redirect, since it puts the page in the Projectspace so readers would not see it on a search for articles.  MBisanz  talk 20:34, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
 * I see what you mean now. I'll get on it tomorrow. Sometimes people are funny when you use "WP:" - so sometimes I've kept away from it. With the search box in mind though, using WP makes a lot more sense - this page is for wikipedians, not the encyclopedia readers. --Matt Lewis (talk) 00:13, 1 December 2008 (UTC)
 * OK - I've created WP:BIDRAFT1 and WP:BIDRAFT2, and have sorted the 'What links here' pages that link to them. You can delete BIDRAFT1 and BIDRAFT2. --Matt Lewis (talk) 07:24, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete, XNR. Stifle (talk) 12:22, 2 December 2008 (UTC)

Zelda 14 → The Legend of Zelda: Phantom Hourglass
The result of the debate was Withdrawn by nominator. (non-admin closure) Unscented (talk) 22:17, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

There is no fourteeth Zelda game; most of the the numbered redirects to Zelda games went to the wrong pages, and when I fixed them, this one was left over. Unscented (talk) 19:01, 30 November 2008 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Keep. the article (and outside sources) claim this is the fourteenth Zelda game. --UsaSatsui (talk) 13:57, 1 December 2008 (UTC)