Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 April 19

April 19
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 19, 2009

Template:Msg:stub → Template:Stub
The result of the discussion was delete. Wizardman 14:07, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned redirect. Seems to be an old nomenclature. — This, that, and the other [talk] 11:07, 19 April 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Comment weren't templates called "MSG" and in article space, once upon a time? 76.66.196.218 (talk) 06:30, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Maybe, but this is the only item here. Anyway, that nomenclature is now long lost. — This, that, and the other [talk] 07:19, 22 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - don't think there's any historical value worth preserving here. Robofish (talk) 03:29, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Fiz → Skrull
The result of the discussion was delete, though if someone has a desire to retarget to Fiz Brown that's okay. Wizardman 14:10, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Irrelevant target. Not sure what to retarget to, or if to disambiguate. See also.— This, that, and the other [talk]  10:51, 19 April 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * comment taking in good faith earlier versions of this when it was an article, which linked to Cadre K which had an earlier version linked to Skrull this redirect is not irrelevant as Fiz is a Cadre K which in turn are Skulls. It apepars to have came about as a result of fixing a double redirect that arose after an afd discussion on Cadre K resulted in it being turned into a redirect rather than an article.  However, as the target does not mention the term being redirected it is questionable as to how useful it is.  Therefore disambiguate the Marvel Character with the tv character Fiz Brown. PaulJones (talk) 12:19, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Fiz Brown, or Delete. The Marvel comics use doesn't seem to be notable enough even to justify a disambiguation page; a hatnote at the top of the destination page would be sufficient. Robofish (talk) 03:28, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

WP:TEAMWORK → Wikipedia:Sock puppetry
The result of the discussion was retarget. Wizardman 14:08, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

I'm not entirely sure what would be an appropriate alternative would be, it just seems to me that this could redirect to a meta-page about working together, why we're here, collaborating, and all that kumbaya stuff. Just my opinion, so I figured I'd let others discuss it.  Grsz 11  01:37, 19 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Also, WhatLinksHere indicates that no policy/guideline pages use this shortcut. WP:MEAT is pretty easy and standard.  Grsz 11  01:45, 19 April 2009 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * Delete as unused link or Retarget to Collaborations.-- Lenticel ( talk ) 04:37, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Retarget to Collaborations: it's a friendlier target. Robofish (talk) 03:26, 27 April 2009 (UTC)