Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2009 April 5

April 5
This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on April 5, 2009

Wikipedia:MYOB → Wikipedia:No personal attacks
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:18, 14 April 2009 (UTC) Unsure how this relates to personal attacks, no pages link here, probably an unlikely search term. Nan oha A's Yu ri    Talk, My master 23:54, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'
 * See MYOB for what it stands for. Uncle G (talk) 14:59, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete Doesn't seem sufficiently relevant to warrant the link. -- Ja Ga  talk 09:09, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Wikipedia:MBAPAIYAEOAOSFBLTTB → Wikipedia:No personal attacks
The result of the discussion was delete.  bibliomaniac 1  5  04:30, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

Unlikely and borderline nonsensical search term when looking for this policy page. Nan oha A's Yu ri    Talk, My master 23:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * That's fine with me. I honestly can't recall why I created it. -- Ned Scott 02:49, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, this is the edit you made immediately before. Ring any bells? --78.151.109.18 (talk) 15:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Ah, now I remember. I'm still fine with deletion. -- Ned Scott 02:33, 12 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Checking the history section for the redirect it stands for Might Be A Personal Attack If You Are Easily Offended And/Or Suffer From Blood Loss To The Brain which I doubt anyone would consider using the abervation of to find the page in question. Few people if any would find this useful. --76.66.184.94 (talk) 04:06, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete IP has it correct. Tavix | Talk  22:39, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

!!!! → ! (disambiguation)
 The result of the discussion was delete.  bibliomaniac 1  5  04:29, 12 April 2009 (UTC) Un-necessary page - see it's Talk page

Control-alt-delete ★ user◾talk◾contrib◾favs 22:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep A string of exclamation points can be commonly found in online chats, the funny pages, and other informal venues. The desire to determine if a string of multiple exclamation points has a different meaning than just a singular punctuation mark seems a reasonable query, making this a plausible search term. --Allen3 talk 11:03, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - unnecessary and an unlikely search string. Otto4711 (talk) 13:38, 8 April 2009 (UTC)
 * delete as unnecessary and unlikely. If this remains then perhaps there should be a !!!!! and !!!!!! too.PaulJones (talk) 15:05, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

A-ONE Textile & Towel industries → A1
 The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:19, 14 April 2009 (UTC) Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig.  Ja Ga  talk 19:53, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

A-1 Communications, Inc. → A1
 The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:20, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * A-1 Communications → A1

Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig.  Ja Ga  talk 19:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

A-1 Auto Service → A1
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:21, 14 April 2009 (UTC) Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig.  Ja Ga  talk 19:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

A-one noodles → A1
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:21, 14 April 2009 (UTC) Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig.  Ja Ga  talk 19:50, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

A1 Motor Stores → A1
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC) Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig.  Ja Ga  talk 19:49, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

A-1 Hotel → A1
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:22, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * A1 hotel → A1
 * A-1 hotel → A1
 * A-One Hotel → A1

Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig.  Ja Ga  talk 19:45, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

A-1 Supermarket → A1
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:23, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * A-one Supermarket → A1
 * A1 Supermarket → A1

Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig.  Ja Ga  talk 19:42, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

A-One cotton factory → A1
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:24, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * A-1 cotton → A1
 * A1 cotton → A1
 * A-1 factory → A1
 * A1 factory → A1

Another unlikely A1 redirect that isn't listed on the disambig.  Ja Ga  talk 19:34, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

A1 food → A1
The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:24, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * A-1 food → A1

The closest I can find on the disambig corresponding to A1 food is the steak sauce, which makes this an unlikely redirect.  Ja Ga  talk 19:31, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

A1 team → A1
<div class="boilerplate mfd" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">The result of the discussion was Deleted. -- JLaTondre (talk) 21:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * A-1 team → A1

There are several A1 leagues, and some competitions, but no A1 team listed on the disambig, making this a misleading redirect.  Ja Ga  talk 19:22, 5 April 2009 (UTC) 'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

Yes we can → Yes We Can
<div class="boilerplate mfd" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">The result of the discussion was turn into a disambiguation page.  bibliomaniac 1  5  04:34, 12 April 2009 (UTC) <span id="Yes, we can">
 * Yes, we can → Yes We Can

Re-target to Sí se puede. These redirects are the English translation of the Spanish political slogan that the music video they are currently redirecting to is based on. As a corollary I would argue that the slogan is more famous than the video. 78.146.29.221 (talk) 17:32, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Oppose create a dab page instead, and target all the English language redirects there, hatnote the English titled article and the Spanish titled article. The third entry would be Obamamania. 76.66.193.69 (talk) 06:31, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * The fact that there are three headnotes on Yes We Can strongly indicates that disambiguation is the way to proceed. And that's not taking into account the above suggestion of a possible fourth conflicting redirect that would be here in the absence of any others. Uncle G (talk) 15:06, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * oppose and turn it into a disambiguation page. PaulJones (talk) 19:28, 6 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep it exactly the way it is. Tavix | Talk  22:40, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

"Business Motivation Model" → Business Motivation Model
<div class="boilerplate mfd" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">The result of the discussion was delete.  bibliomaniac 1  5  04:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC) Redundant Anshuk (talk) 08:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Redundant. — Gavia immer (talk) 13:17, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Agreed as redundant, created in error. Greyskinnedboy (talk) 23:14, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'

Ulitimate Edition → Command & Conquer: Red Alert 3
<div class="boilerplate mfd" style="background:#FFEEDD; margin-top:0.5em; padding:0 10px 0 10px; border:1px solid #888888;">The result of the discussion was delete.  bibliomaniac 1  5  04:35, 12 April 2009 (UTC) Per The original tagger's rationale on my talk page. NuclearWarfare  ( Talk ) 01:37, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete there are oh so many ultimate editions including MS Winddows and DOA 70.29.213.241 (talk) 05:12, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

'The above is preserved as the archive of a RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.'